Holloway v. State, 7 Div. 312
| Decision Date | 26 July 1956 |
| Docket Number | 7 Div. 312 |
| Citation | 265 Ala. 697,89 So.2d 317 |
| Parties | Rosa Lee HOLLOWAY v. STATE. |
| Court | Alabama Supreme Court |
Ben F. Ray, Birmingham, and Guy Sparks, Anniston, for petitioner.
John Patterson, Atty. Gen., and Robt. Straub, Asst. Atty. Gen., opposed.
Petition of Rosa Lee Holloway for certiorari to the Court of Appeals to review and revise the judgment and decision of that Court in Holloway v. State, 89 So.2d 313.
Writ denied.
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
Robinson v. United States
...States, 328 U.S. 750, 765, 66 S.Ct. 1239, 1248, 90 L.Ed. 1557 (1946); Holloway v. State, 38 Ala.App. 434, 89 So.2d 313, cert. denied, 89 So.2d 317 (1956). 5. We find no merit to appellant's final contention that the trial court abused its discretion in not admitting the expert testimony of ......
-
Morris v. State, 1 Div. 772
...Higginbotham v. State, 262 Ala. 236, 78 So.2d 637; Holloway v. State, 38 Ala.App. 434, 89 So.2d 313, certiorari denied, 265 Ala. 697, 89 So.2d 317; Graham v. State, 22 Ala.App. 48, 112 So. The record contains twenty-four written charges, other than requests for the affirmative charge, which......
-
Allen v. State
...testifies in his own behalf is likewise subject to contradiction. Holloway v. State, 38 Ala.App. 434, 89 So.2d 313, cert. denied 265 Ala. 697, 89 So.2d 317. The State was plainly rebutting or contradicting Mrs. Allen's The facts adduced by the State were plainly material and relevant. They ......
- Huling v. State, 7 Div. 344