Hollowell v. Hollowell, 0361-87-1
| Citation | 369 S.E.2d 451,6 Va.App. 417 |
| Decision Date | 07 June 1988 |
| Docket Number | No. 0361-87-1,0361-87-1 |
| Parties | Thomas Sidney HOLLOWELL, Sr. v. Vivian Ann McCreary HOLLOWELL. Record |
| Court | Court of Appeals of Virginia |
John E. Zydron (Bryan & Zydron, Chesapeake, on brief), for appellee.
Present: KOONTZ, C.J., and BENTON and COLE, JJ.
Upon the wife's motion to reconsider the amount of spousal support awarded to her in a final divorce decree based upon a change in circumstances, the trial court increased her spousal support to $300 monthly. The trial court further held that post-marital misconduct is not relevant to the issue of a modification of spousal support.
On appeal, the husband raises three issues: (1) whether the court should have terminated spousal support because the wife lived in a common law relationship after entry of the final decree; (2) whether the court should have terminated spousal support because the wife lived and cohabited with men after entry of the final decree; 1 and (3) whether the court erred in not requiring witnesses to answer inquiries as to their sexual relations and allowing them to invoke their privilege against self-incrimination when the statute of limitations had run on misdemeanors.
The wife was originally granted a no fault divorce and awarded one dollar annually for support and maintenance. Thereafter, because of a disability, she petitioned for an increase in support. Having found material changes in the circumstances of the parties, the trial court was required to evaluate whether those changes in circumstances justified a modification in spousal support "as the circumstances may make proper." Code § 20-109. "Allowance of periodic payments for support and maintenance is made upon the basis of the circumstances disclosed by the evidence at the time of the award." Thomas v. Thomas, 217 Va. 502, 505, 229 S.E.2d 887, 889-90 (1976). Where changed circumstances are demonstrated, the court has continuing jurisdiction to increase, decrease or terminate such an award upon the petition of either spouse. Id. at 505, 229 S.E.2d at 890. "If circumstances change and the wife's needs become greater in the future, the court has continuing jurisdiction to make a modification as the circumstances warrant at that time." Lapidus v. Lapidus, 226 Va. 575, 583, 311 S.E.2d 786, 789 (1984).
Interpreting a statute similar to ours, the Court of Appeals of North Carolina has held that "changed circumstances" must bear upon the financial needs of the dependent spouse or the ability of the supporting spouse to pay. The term has no relevance to the...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Nielsen v. Nielsen
...facts and circumstances surrounding the departure when determining the spouse's current earning capacity. See Hollowell v. Hollowell, 6 Va. App. 417, 419, 369 S.E.2d 451 (1988) ; Code § 20-107.1(E).C. Modification of Spousal Support7 Finally, wife argues that the court erred in "finding tha......
-
Williams v. Williams, Record No. 1176-08-2 (Va. App. 7/21/2009)
..."must bear upon the financial needs of the dependent spouse or the ability of the supporting spouse to pay." Hollowell v. Hollowell, 6 Va. App. 417, 419, 369 S.E.2d 451, 452 (1988). This authority of the trial court to modify spousal support, however, is subject to the Code § 20-109(C) prov......
-
Street v. Street
..."must bear upon the financial needs of the dependent spouse or the ability of the supporting spouse to pay." Hollowell v. Hollowell, 6 Va.App. 417, 419, 369 S.E.2d 451, 452 (1988). Here, the record established that husband's ADD was not a new condition but, rather, as his psychiatrist testi......
-
Courtney v. Courtney, Record No. 2124-05-1 (Va. App. 6/20/2006)
...of either party or remarriage of the dependent spouse, unless the parties agree otherwise. Code § 20-109; Hollowell v. Hollowell, 6 Va. App. 417, 419, 369 S.E.2d 451, 452 (1988). Thus, it is well established that husband's spousal support obligation will not terminate until the death of eit......