Holmes v. Powers
| Court | Supreme Court of Kentucky |
| Writing for the Court | PALMORE |
| Citation | Holmes v. Powers, 439 S.W.2d 579 (Ky. 1968) |
| Decision Date | 13 December 1968 |
| Parties | A. S. HOLMES and Whitley County Medical Society, Appellants, v. Allene POWERS, Appellee. |
Eugene Siler, Jr., Williamsburg, for appellants.
J. B. Johnson, Jr., Williamsburg, for appellee.
This, to say the least, is an unusual case. The appellants, county health officer and local medical society of Whitley County, seek a declaratory judgment to the effect that they can sterilize the appellee, a 35-year-old unmarried woman who is mentally retarded and has two illegitimate children (one of whom also is retarded), without civil or criminal liability to themselves. They appeal from an adjudication that they 'cannot legally perform a sexual sterilization operation upon the defendant because the defendant is not mentally competent to grant permission and there is no legal authority providing for the granting of such permission in any manner.'
There simply is no escape from the conclusion reached by the trial court. If, as alleged and proved, the appellee is in fact mentally incompetent, she does not have legal capacity to consent to...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Conservatorship of N.
...that the best interests of an incompetent and unreasoning ward will be served by such an operation. Tulley's reliance upon Holmes v. Powers, supra 439 S.W.2d 579, Wade v. Bethesda Hospital, supra, 337 F.Supp. 671, and In Interest of M.K.R., supra, 515 S.W.2d 467, in support of its position ......
-
P.S. by Harbin v. W.S.
...146 Cal.Rptr. 266, cert. denied, 440 U.S. 967, 99 S.Ct. 1519, 59 L.Ed.2d 783; Matter of S.C.E. (Del.Ch.1977) 378 A.2d 144; Holmes v. Powers (Ky.1968) 439 S.W.2d 579; In re M.K.R. (Mo.1974) 515 S.W.2d 467; In re Penny N. (1980) 120 N.H. 269, 414 A.2d 541; Application of A.D. (1977) 90 Misc.2......
-
Grady, Matter of
...v. G. R. H., 163 Ind.App. 636, 325 N.E.2d 501 (1975), cert. denied, 425 U.S. 936, 96 S.Ct. 1669, 48 L.Ed.2d 178 (1976); Holmes v. Powers, 439 S.W.2d 579 (Ky.Ct.App.1968); In re M. K. R., 515 S.W.2d 467 (Mo.1974); Application of A. D., 90 Misc.2d 236, 394 N.Y.S.2d 139 (Surr.Ct.1977), aff'd o......
-
Moe, Matter of
...178 (1976). In Interest of M. K. R., 515 S.W.2d 467 (Mo.1974). Frazier v. Levi, 440 S.W.2d 393 (Tex.Civ.App.1969). Holmes v. Powers, 439 S.W.2d 579 (Ky.App.1968). Cf. Wade v. Bethesda Hosp., 337 F.Supp. 671 (S.D.Ohio 1971). These cases are distinguishable in some instances, and are generall......