Holt v. City of Mobile

Decision Date26 November 1918
Docket Number1 Div. 258
Citation80 So. 171,16 Ala.App. 597
PartiesHOLT v. CITY OF MOBILE.
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals

Appeal from Circuit Court, Mobile County; Norvelle R. Leigh, Jr., Judge.

Prosecution by the City of Mobile against J.W. Holt. Defendant was convicted, and appeals. Affirmed.

Brooks & McMillan, of Mobile, for appellant.

Robert H. Smith, of Mobile, for appellee.

BROWN, P.J.

The only question presented on the record is whether or not the evidence is sufficient to authorize the judgment of conviction. There was some evidence tending to show that the defendant was in charge of the place where the officers found liquor stored, and in a building that was not used exclusively for a dwelling. Jones v. Montgomery, 77 So. 969; Conner v. State, 78 So. 715; Holt v. State, 78 So. 315.

The testimony was given ore tenus before the court, sitting without a jury, and we are unable to say from the evidence in the record that the conclusion of the trial court is plainly and palpably contrary to the great weight of the evidence. Union Mut. Aid Ass'n of Mobile v. Carroway, 78 So. 792; Smith v. Thomas, 78 So. 820; Mulligan v. State, 72 So. 761.

Affirmed.

To continue reading

Request your trial

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT