Holyfield v. State
Decision Date | 13 June 1919 |
Docket Number | 3 Div. 350 |
Citation | 82 So. 652,17 Ala.App. 162 |
Parties | HOLYFIELD v. STATE. |
Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
On Rehearing, June 17, 1919
Appeal from Circuit Court, Montgomery County; Leon McCord, Judge.
Charlie Holyfield, indicted under two counts, the first charging the receiving of stolen property, and the second charging grand larceny, was convicted of receiving stolen property, and appeals. Affirmed.
The following are the charges refused to the defendant:
Hill Hill, Whiting & Thomas, of Montgomery, for appellant.
J.Q Smith, Atty. Gen., and Horace Wilkinson, Asst. Atty. Gen for the State.
It was disclosed by the evidence that the Central Market sent an order by its porter, one John Davis, to the slaughterhouse for four cattle and two calves; that when this order was presented it read 4 1/2 cattle and 2 calves, and that Davis left the slaughterhouse with them. When he got to a point where there was a dray stand on Monroe street, in the city of Montgomery, he delivered to the defendant, who was a drayman the one-half cattle. The defendant took it, and immediately drove to Dennis Vine's restaurant, a short distance away and told Vine he had come to deliver it. Vine refused to take it. The defendant thereupon drove back to the dray stand, stood there awhile, and then drove out to a point on the Red Bridge Road, and delivered it to a market man by the name of Allen Hayes, the defendant and Allen Hayes both testifying that the defendant said at the time he brought the meat there "that the meat did not belong to him, and that when the fellow comes out here, if you want it, he might sell it to you." Subsequently the police went out to Hayes' place, arrested him, and brought him and the meat to police headquarters. It was also shown that from the time Davis left the slaughterhouse until the meat was delivered to Hayes on the Red Bridge Road, some miles away from the dray stand on Monroe street, the meat was followed by a boy from the slaughterhouse, and up to the point when the meat was left in the possession of Hayes every fact and circumstance offered to be proved by the defendant and relating to the transaction was admitted in evidence. The defendant then offered to prove that some hours after the meat had been delivered to him by Davis and he had hauled it, first to Vine's attempting to deliver it to him, and then to Hayes, to whom he did deliver it, he made certain statements to Mr. Knox and Mr. Paul Rapport, the latter being a member of the police department of the city of Montgomery, relative to how he acquired the meat, and seeking their...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Largin v. State
... ... "spontaneous exclamations," such as are ... declarations made under such circumstances as that it may be ... reasonably affirmed that the declarations were instinctive ... from the occurrences to which they relate rather than the ... retrospective narration of a past fact. Holyfield v ... State, 17 Ala.App. 162, 82 So. 652; Nelson v ... State, 130 Ala. 83, 30 So. 728; Ellis v. State, ... 18 Ala.App. 344, 93 So. 334; Oldacre v. State, 16 ... Ala.App. 151, 75 So. 827. Under certain conditions the time ... at which these exclamations and declarations are made, so as ... ...
-
Shearer v. State
...occurrence. Such being the case, the declaration was a part of the res gestæ. Nelson v. State, 130 Ala. 83, 30 So. 728; Holyfield v. State, 17 Ala. App. 162, 82 So. 652; Newson v. State, 15 Ala. App. 43, 72 So. Johnson v. State, 183 Ala. 79, 63 So. 163. It is the law, and has been so held m......
-
Turner v. State
... ... would appear, no opportunity for the formation of a ... deliberate statement. It appears with reasonable certainty ... that the statement was instinctive upon the difficulty, and ... not a mere narration of a past transaction. Nelson v ... State, 130 Ala. 88, 30 So. 728; Holyfield v ... State, 82 So. 652 ... There ... is no error in the record, and the judgment is affirmed ... ...
-
Ellis v. State
... ... of them at that time would have been admissible against them, ... without proof of a predicate showing it to have been ... voluntary, on the ground that it was a part of the res gestæ, ... and, being a [18 Ala.App. 545] part of the res gestæ, was ... admissible for the defendant. Holyfield v. State, 17 ... Ala. App. 162, 82 So. 652; Oldacre v. State, 16 Ala ... App. 151, 75 So. 827; Wesley v. State, 52 Ala. 182; ... Smith v. State, 52 Ala. 407. As to what the answer ... of the witness would have been we cannot know, but later the ... defendant was permitted to prove by Parsons ... ...