Home Insurance Company v. Leavitt, 23526.
Decision Date | 24 July 1970 |
Docket Number | No. 23526.,23526. |
Citation | 429 F.2d 1276 |
Parties | HOME INSURANCE COMPANY, Inc., Appellee, v. Herbert LEAVITT, individually and as Administrator for the Estate of William Leavitt (Appellant), and Cripple Creek Resort, Inc., Appellants. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit |
Millard F. Ingraham (argued), of Ingraham & Niewohner, Barry W. Jackson, of Jackson & Fenton, Fairbanks, Alaska, for appellant Leavitt.
Robert A. Parrish, Fairbanks, Alaska, for appellant Cripple Creek Resort, Inc.
Jerome I. Braun (argued), of Elke, Farella, Braun & Martel, Richard M. Bryan, San Francisco, Cal., for appellee.
Before MADDEN,* Judge of the United States Court of Claims, and ELY and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges.
Leavitt appeals from a judgment entered in favor of Home Insurance Company, Inc. ("Home"), after the district court granted Home's motion for summary judgment.
Home had written a comprehensive liability policy (general-automobile) in favor of its assured, Cripple Creek Resort, Inc. ("Cripple Creek"), sometime prior to May 3, 1964. It undertook to defend and to indemnify its assured under terms and conditions stated in the policy. On May 3, 1964, William Leavitt was killed in an automobile accident near Fairbanks, Alaska. Leavitt was riding as a passenger in an automobile driven by Russell Gillaspie, Jr.
On March 23, 1965, the administrator of Leavitt's estate sued Gillaspie and Cripple Creek, claiming that Cripple Creek was liable for Leavitt's wrongful death because it had served intoxicating liquor to Gillaspie, a minor who was then intoxicated, in violation of cited sections of the Alaskan statutes.
Cripple Creek tendered defense of the action to Home. Home denied coverage and refused to defend. Cripple Creek secured other counsel who settled the case by confessing judgment in favor of Leavitt's estate for $100,000 plus costs and attorney's fees and by obtaining the administrator's agreement not to execute on the judgment so long as Cripple Creek prosecuted its action against Home.
On January 5, 1967, Home filed an action against Leavitt's administrator and Cripple Creek seeking a declaration that it was not required to defend Cripple Creek against the wrongful death action and that it was not required to indemnify Cripple Creek upon its settlement of that litigation. Cripple Creek defaulted. Home and the administrator each sought summary judgment. The district court denied the administrator's motion, granted Home's motion, and this...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
New Hampshire Ins. Co. v. Hillwinds Inn, Inc., 7626
...to its intoxicated customers. See also Three Sons, Inc. v. Phoenix Ins. Co., 357 Mass. 271, 257 N.E.2d 774 (1970); Home Ins. Co. v. Leavitt, 429 F.2d 1276 (9th Cir. 1970). The clause in question is more or less standard language in tavern and saloon general liability policies, and is genera......
-
United States v. Bradford, 28477.
... ... to surrender to them the following morning at his home. Pursuant to this request they went to his home the next ... ...