Home Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. Pittman, 17856

CourtUnited States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
Citation71 So. 739,111 Miss. 420
Decision Date15 May 1916
Docket Number17856
PartiesHOME MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY v. PITTMAN

71 So. 739

111 Miss. 420

HOME MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANY
v.

PITTMAN

No. 17856

Supreme Court of Mississippi

May 15, 1916


APPEAL from the circuit court of Yalobusha county, HON. J. B. ECKLES, Judge.

Suit by N. A. Pittman against the Home Mutual Fire Insurance Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court.

Case reversed, and suit dismissed.

McLaurin & Aemistead, and T. G. Birchett, for appellant.

Greekmore & Stone, for appellee.

OPINION

[111 Miss. 421] POTTER, J.

This was a suit begun by N. A. Pittman, appellee, in this court, plaintiff in the court below, against the Home Mutual Fire Insurance Company, appellant here and defendant in the court below.

The defendant was a mutual fire insurance company, and, upon appellee's request, insured, in one policy, two [111 Miss. 422] dwelling houses belonging to the appellee; dwelling house No. 1 was insured for four hundred dollars and dwelling house No. 2 for six hundred dollars. Dwelling house No. 2 was destroyed by fire on the 28th day of June, 1912; and the appellant filed his suit in the circuit court to recover on the policy. It developed, after the fire, that the house destroyed was situated on land not owned by appellee but by his wife. The said house, the uncontradicted facts show, was built thereon permissively and without understanding or agreement between the appellee and his wife, and was occupied by their son as a residence. The defendant denied liability and tendered the premium, which tender was refused.

The policy in question contains the following clause:

"If there is, or shall be, other prior, concurrent, or subsequent insurance, whether valid or not, on said property, or any part thereof, without the company's written consent, or if said building, or either of them, now is or shall become vacant or unoccupied, or if the hazard become increased in any way, whether under the control and knowledge of the member, or not, or if the property or any part thereof shall be sold or conveyed, or if the property insured now is, or shall become, incumbered by mortgage or otherwise, or any change takes place in the title, occupation or possession thereof whatsoever, or if foreclosure proceedings shall be commenced, or if the interests of the member in said property, or any part thereof, now is, or shall become, any other or less than a perfect legal and equitable title and ownership, free from all liens whatsoever, except as stated in writing hereon, or if the buildings or either of them stand on leased ground (or land of which the assured has not a perfect title), or if this contract shall be assigned without the company's written consent hereon, then, and in any such case, this contract shall be absolutely null and void."

The defendant filed the plea of general issue, and gave notice thereunder setting out the above clause of the policy sued on, and...

To continue reading

Request your trial
51 cases
  • Citizens Nat. Bank of Meridian v. Golden, 31943
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • 23 Marzo 1936
    ...v. Baton, 131 So. 346, 159 Miss. 236; Germania Life Ins. Co. v. Bouldin, 100 Miss. 660, 56 So. 609; Home Mutual Fire Ins. Co. v. Patterson, 71 So. 739, 111 Miss. 429; Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. CO. v. Nix, 138 So. 518, 162 Miss. 669; 20 Cyc. 49; Corley v. Redd, 164, Miss. 678, 145 So. 2......
  • Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. Roberts, 31898
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • 25 Noviembre 1935
    ...Prod. Co., 132 So. 73, 159 Miss. 369; New Amsterdam Cas. Co. v. Perryman, 140 So. 73, 162 Miss. 864; Home Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Pittman, 71 So. 739, 111 Miss. 420; Germania Life Ins. Co. v. Bouldin, 66 So. 609, 100 Miss. 660. The policy sued on is clear and unambiguous and the permanent and......
  • Mississippi Power Co. v. May, 31616
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • 3 Junio 1935
    ...v. Russell, 89 Miss. 437, 42 So. 233; Germania Life Ins. Co. v. Bouldin, 100 Miss. 660, 56 So. 609; Home Mutual Fire Ins Co. v. Patterson, 71 So. 739, 111 Miss. 420; Springfield Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. Nix, 138 So. 518, 162 Miss. 669; Corley et al. v. Reed et al., 164 Miss. 678, 145 So. 2......
  • Mississippi Power Co. v. Bennett, 31503
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Mississippi
    • 29 Abril 1935
    ...Russell Co., 89 Miss. 437, 42 So. 233; Germania Life Ins. Co. v. Bouldin, 100 Miss. 660, 56 So. 609; Home Mut. Fire Ins. Co. v. Pittman, 111 Miss. 420, 71 So. 739; Corley et al. v. Reed et al., 164 Miss. 678, 145 So. 241; American Oil Co. v. Williamson, 154 Miss. 441, [173 Miss. 151] 122 So......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT