Homemakers North Shore, Inc. v. Bowen, 87-1389

Citation823 F.2d 174
Decision Date26 June 1987
Docket NumberNo. 87-1389,87-1389
PartiesHOMEMAKERS NORTH SHORE, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (7th Circuit)

Sanford V. Teplitzky, Ober, Kaler, Grimes & Shriver, Baltimore, Md., Lawrence M. Gavin, Boodell Sears Giambalvo & Crowley, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff-appellant.

Donna Morros Weinstein, Dept. of Health & Human Services, Chicago, Ill., for defendant-appellee.

Before COFFEY, FLAUM and RIPPLE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The Secretary has filed a motion asking that this court dismiss the appeal on the authority of Foremost Sales Promotions, Inc. v. Director, Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms, 812 F.2d 1044 (7th Cir.1987). This case is clearly distinguishable. The minute order states: "The Secretary is granted summary judgment. Plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment is defnied [sic]. Pretrial conference and trial dates are stricken." This entry was preceded by the phrase "judgment is entered as follows:" Unlike Foremost, it completely and succinctly ends the litigation. It is crystal clear that there is nothing left to be decided. The judgment is final and appealable.

The Secretary is given five (5) days to file his brief.

SO ORDERED.

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Edgewater Hosp., Inc. v. Bowen
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • 9 Enero 1989
    ...Because that holding completely and succinctly ends the litigation, the judgment is final and appealable. Homemakers North Shore, Inc. v. Bowen, 823 F.2d 174, 174 (7th Cir.1987). Appellee asserts, however, that the judgment was only partial, and that the district court did not comply with t......
  • Paganis v. Blonstein
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • 24 Agosto 1993
    ...1289 (7th Cir.1991) (judgment which did not use the words "with prejudice" held to comply with Rule 58); Homemakers North Shore, Inc. v. Bowen, 823 F.2d 174, 174 (7th Cir.1987) (judgment "completely and succinctly" ended litigation despite the fact that the words "with prejudice" were Furth......
  • Jaske v. C.I.R., 86-3078
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Seventh Circuit
    • 26 Junio 1987

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT