Hood v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SUMTER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2, SUMTER COUNTY SOUTH CAROLINA,, 7163.

Citation232 F.2d 626
Decision Date25 April 1956
Docket NumberNo. 7163.,7163.
PartiesWoodrow W. HOOD, Peggy Ann Hood, Lever Ray, Irma Ray, Henry Lowrey, and Ruth Lowrey, Appellants, v. BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF SUMTER COUNTY SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 2, SUMTER COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA, J. E. Mayes, Jr., Chairman of said Board, H. E. Kirven, C. W. Goodman, W. T. Brogdon, J. Elbert Davis, Jr., Members of said Board, Appellees.
CourtUnited States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (4th Circuit)

A. S. Merrimon, Sumter, S. C., for appellants.

John S. Wilson, Sumter, S. C. (Shepard K. Nash and L. E. Purdy, Sumter, S. C., on brief), for appellees.

Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion for summary judgment in an action by school children for an injunction to prevent discrimination on the ground of race. As the denial of motion for summary judgment is not a final judgment in the case, we can entertain the appeal only by considering the denial of the motion as a denial of injunctive relief. So considered, the order denying such relief must be affirmed, as the administrative remedies prescribed by the recent South Carolina statute1 have not been exhausted. Carson v. Board of Education of McDowell County, 4 Cir., 227 F.2d 789. As plaintiffs were not entitled to injunctive relief for this reason, we affirm the order in so far as it denies an injunction, without passing upon other questions raised in the case or approving the reasoning of the court below in denying the motion for summary judgment.

Affirmed.

1 An Act to amend sections 21-103 and 21-46 of the Code of Laws of South Carolina, 1952, Approved March 8, 1956.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • NATIONAL ASS'N FOR ADVANCE. OF COLORED PEOPLE v. Patty
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Virginia
    • 21 Enero 1958
    ...his views since that opinion was filed and has accepted the views reflected in the earlier cases of Doby v. Brown, infra, and Hood v. Board of Trustees, infra, and the later cases of Government and Civic Employees Organizing Committee, C. I. O. v. Windsor, supra, and Lassiter v. Taylor, sup......
  • Spangler v. United States
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 28 Agosto 1969
    ...plaintiff sought, which presumably would have affected all schools and all grades in the School District," Id., 108. Hood v. Board of Trustees (4 Cir. 1956) 232 F.2d 626, cert. denied 352 U.S. 870, 77 S.Ct. 95, 1 L.Ed.2d 76 (1956) treated an order denying a motion for summary judgment in a ......
  • Adkins v. School Board of the City of Newport News
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Virginia
    • 11 Enero 1957
    ...administrative remedies before seeking relief in the federal courts. Carson v. Board of Education, 4 Cir., 227 F.2d 789; Hood v. Board of Trustees, 4 Cir., 232 F.2d 626; Carson v. Warlick, 4 Cir. 238 F.2d 724; Robinson v. Board of Education, D.C.Md., 143 F.Supp. 481; School Board of City of......
  • Alexander v. Pacific Maritime Association
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Ninth Circuit
    • 6 Mayo 1964
    ...in the control of the litigation" rather than an appealable injunction of an action at law. 4 Cf. Hood v. Board of Trustees of Sumter County School District No. 2 (4 Cir. 1956) 232 F.2d 626, cert. denied (1956) 352 U.S. 870, 77 S.Ct. 95, 1 L.Ed.2d 76; Federal Glass Co. v. Loshin (2 Cir. 195......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT