Hood v. Martin

Decision Date10 February 1921
Docket Number7 Div. 119
Citation205 Ala. 333,87 So. 529
PartiesHOOD v. MARTIN.
CourtAlabama Supreme Court

Appeal from Circuit Court, Etowah County; O.A. Steele, Judge.

Bill by J.H. Martin against R.L. Hood to enforce a lien upon certain crops and for an accounting, etc. From a decree overruling demurrers to the bill, raising the point of a want of equity in the bill and adequacy of legal remedies, respondent appeals. Affirmed.

P.E Culli, of Gadsden, for appellant.

E.O McCord & Son, of Gadsden, for appellee.

ANDERSON C.J.

The contract between the parties, as per the averments of the bill, does not make them landlord and tenant, under section 4742 of the Code of 1907, as amended by the act of 1915 (page 134), nor hirer and laborer, under section 4743 of the Code of 1907, as amended by the act of 1915 (page 112). Under the terms of said contract Hood was not only to furnish the land but was to assist in the preparation of the same and the planting of the crops, while the appellee, Martin, was to furnish the labor, team, and tools to cultivate and gather the crop. They were therefore tenants in common and governed by section 4792 of the Code of 1907, which gives each of them a lien upon the respective share of the other for the advances or contribution of labor to aid in the cultivation or gathering of the crop. Section 4793 provides for the enforcement of such lien by attachment upon the grounds and in the manner provided for the enforcement of the landlord's lien. This section, however, is not exclusive but expressly authorizes the enforcement of the lien by any other remedy. The lien is enforceable in a court of equity notwithstanding the remedy at law. Westmorland v Foster, 60 Ala. 448; Wells v. Cody, 112 Ala. 278, 20 So. 381; Waldron v. Simmons, 28 Ala. 629.

True, section 5234 of the Code of 1907 provides for the partition of crops, gathered or ungathered, in the probate court, and section 5239 provides for a division in kind or a sale and division of the proceeds and for the adjustment of any liens upon same; but this remedy is not exclusive, as section 4829 of the Code provides for the enforcement of lien in equity, although the statute may authorize other modes of doing so.

The bill in this case, in its final analysis, sets up a joint ownership in the crop, existing liens upon same by the appellee and the appellant, the seizure and withholding of said crop by the appellant, and seeks a sale of...

To continue reading

Request your trial
3 cases
  • Russell v. Thornton
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • April 7, 1927
    ... ... as very clearly such a lien is enforceable in equity under ... the plain provisions of section 8935, Code of 1923. Hood ... v. Martin, 205 Ala. 333, 87 So. 529; Mathis v ... Holman, 204 Ala. 373, 85 So. 710; Wise v ... State, 208 Ala. 58, 93 So. 886. The ... ...
  • Biddle v. Employers Ins. Co. of Ala.
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • April 3, 1952
    ...The petition contains inconsistent allegations as to dates. The suit is by one partner on a partnership insurance contract. Hood v. Martin, 205 Ala. 332, 87 So. 529; Fred Gray Cotton & Gin Co. v. Smith, 214 Ala. 606, 108 So. 532. The substance of the claim is that the insurer acted in bad f......
  • Culbert v. Johnson
    • United States
    • Alabama Supreme Court
    • October 10, 1940
    ... ... in common of any crops that may have been produced on said ... lands during said year. Hood v. Martin, 205 Ala ... 333, 87 So. 529; Ragsdale v. Kinney, 119 Ala. 454, ... 24 So. 443; Code, § 8872. At all events, under the terms of ... ...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT