Hopkins v. Super. Ct.
| Docket Number | B270503 |
| Decision Date | 01 September 2016 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
13 cases
-
Tan v. Superior Court of San Mateo Cnty.
...not eligible for military diversion. ( VanVleck , at pp. 363–367, 205 Cal.Rptr.3d 839.) The court in Hopkins v. Superior Court (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 1275, 1278–1279, 207 Cal.Rptr.3d 217, review granted Nov. 16, 2016, S237734, disagreed, noting the canon of construction that specific statutes......
-
People v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty.
...Court (2015) 60 Cal.4th 940, 956-960, 184 Cal.Rptr.3d 60, 342 P.3d 1217 ( State Dept. ) ; Hopkins v. Superior Court (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 1275, 1285-1286, 207 Cal.Rptr.3d 217 ( Hopkins ), in concluding both that (1) the statutes irreconcilably conflict, and (2) the Legislature intended the n......
-
Moore v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty.
...diversion ( VanVleck, supra , 2 Cal.App.5th at p. 365, 205 Cal.Rptr.3d 839 ), while the court in Hopkins v. Superior Court (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 1275, 207 Cal.Rptr.3d 217 ( Hopkins ), held that Penal Code section 1001.80 "supersedes Vehicle Code section 23640 to the extent that the latter st......
-
People v. Superior Court of Riverside Cnty.
...839.)Shortly thereafter a panel of the Second District Court of Appeal reached the opposite conclusion. In Hopkins v. Superior Court (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 1275, 207 Cal.Rptr.3d 217, the court found that because the military diversion statute " ‘appl[ies] whenever a [misdemeanor] case is befo......
Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
-
Table of cases
...F2d 465 (6th Cir. 1959), §1:54.2 Hopkins v. Bovicino, 573 F3d 752 (9th Cir. 2009), §7:20.7, 7:77.3(a) Hopkins v. Superior Court (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 1275, §§3:55.1, 3:55.2, 8:10 Hopt v. People of Utah (1887) 120 U.S. 430, §9:12 Horner v. Board of Trustees (1964) 61 Cal.2d 79, §11:217 Hosek ......
-
Diversion and the suspension of proceedings
...Veh. C § 23640 bars it. This led to a split of authority in two published Court of Appeal cases, with Hopkins v. Superior Court (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 1275, holding that Veh. C §23640 does not bar it and People v. VanVleck (2016) 2 Cal. App.5th 355, reaching the opposite conclusion. The Hopki......
-
Developments in Law Regarding Veterans
...that military diversion is not available for defendants charged with driving under the influence. In Hopkins v. Superior Court (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 1275, the appeals court reached the opposite conclusion. The California Supreme Court granted review in Hopkins.The language in Hopkins include......