Horn v. State
| Decision Date | 29 June 1929 |
| Docket Number | 7 Div. 542. |
| Citation | Horn v. State, 23 Ala.App. 273, 124 So. 125 (Ala. App. 1929) |
| Parties | HORN v. STATE. |
| Court | Alabama Court of Appeals |
Rehearing Denied Oct. 8, 1929.
Appeal from Circuit Court, Clay County; E. S. Lyman, Judge.
Chambers Horn was convicted of unlawfully possessing a still, and he appeals.Affirmed.
Pruet & Glass, of Ashland, for appellant.
Charlie C. McCall, Atty. Gen., for the State.
The verdict of the jury was guilty as charged in the second count of the indictment.The second count charged, in proper form and substance, the unlawful possession of a still, etc., to be used for the purpose of manufacturing or distilling prohibited liquors or beverages.The evidence was ample to prove the corpus delicti, and this was without dispute or conflict.There was likewise no dispute about this appellant being present at the still at the time of the "raid" by the officers, and the evidence of the state tended to show that this appellant was busily engaged in the operation of the still.This he denied, and offered other evidence to sustain him in his insistence.This conflict presented a jury question, and from the whole evidence the jury were fully warranted in returning their verdict as rendered.
The conversation between the officers and the men arrested at the still, at the time the raid was in progress and the arrests being made, were of the res gestæ, and therefore...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
American Sur. Co. of N. Y. v. Hooker
...270, 144 So. 371; Garrett v. State, 33 Ala.App. 168, 31 So.2d 151; Buffalow v. State, 34 Ala.App. 418, 41 So.2d 417; Horn v. State, 23 Ala.App. 273, 124 So. 125. Be this as it may, assuming but not deciding that the statute had no application, the right of the defendant could not have been ......
-
Garrett v. State
... ... Collins v. State, 27 Ala.App. 499, 176 So. 219 ... At the ... conclusion of the oral charge counsel for appellant stated: ... 'If the court please, we object to that part of the oral ... charge which defines manslaughter in the second degree.' ... This court held in Horn v. State, 23 Ala.App. 273, ... 124 So. 125, that an 'objection' to a portion of the ... court's oral charge is not equivalent to an ... 'exception' and the former approach does not present ... any question for review. See also Abrams v. State, ... 155 Ala. 105, 46 So. 464 ... Be ... ...
-
McMullin v. State
...An "exception" is not equivalent to an "objection". Garrett v. State, 33 Ala.App. 168, 31 So.2d 151 (1947); Horn v. State, 23 Ala.App. 273, 124 So. 125 (1929). Exceptions, like objections, must be specific. Whittle v. State, 205 Ala. 639, 89 So. 43 (1921); Graham v. State, 46 Ala.App. 608, ......
-
Jackson v. State, 3 Div. 880.
... ... not have to elect between the two charges. Also that there ... are only two forms of verdict, Guilty and Not guilty.' ... This ... court has held that an objection to a certain part of the ... oral charge is not equivalent to an exception. Horn v ... State, 23 Ala.App. 273, 124 So. 125 ... [31 So.2d 519.] ... We ... quote from the record: ... 'The ... Court: I take back my ruling in the civil suit. I think I am ... wrong in that ruling. I think I will let you ask the ... question ... 'Mr ... ...