Hornberger v. State
| Decision Date | 14 December 1854 |
| Citation | 6 Ind. 26 |
| Parties | Hornberger v. The State |
| Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
From the Dearborn Court of Common Pleas.
The judgment is affirmed with costs.
J. Ryman, for appellant.
R. A. Riley, N. B. Taylor and J. Coburn, for the state.
At the June term of the Court of Common Pleas of Dearborn county, an information was filed against Hornberger for retailing without license. The information is in the usual form, except that there is no averment the liquor sold was of any value. The defendant pleaded not guilty, was tried by the Court, and fined 4 dollars. There is no motion to quash--no motion for a new trial or in arrest of judgment.
For the reasons given in a case between the same parties decided at this term [1], the judgment must be affirmed.
The judgment is affirmed with costs.
---------
Notes:
[1]See Hornberger v. State, 5 Ind. 300.
---------
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Farmers' Bank v. Orr
... ... and amended fourth paragraphs of the separate answer of ... appellee Orr. These paragraphs seek to state facts ... constituting an estoppel in pais, and are similar to ... the preceding paragraphs of a like character, and differ from ... them in ... ...
-
Pearsoll v. Chapin
...9; 22 Pick. 20, 546; 4 Harris 204; 12 Barb. 641; 14 Id. 594; 16 Id. 221; 23 Pick. 283; 8 Met. 550; 5 Cush. 126; 3 Wend. 236; 7 Black 501; 6 Ind. 26; 12 Ill. 15 Mass. 319; 38 Maine 589; 13 B. Mon. 172; 25 Verm. 234; 30 Id. 139; 22 Ala. 249; 32 Id. 384. And the same is the usual rule where a ......
-
Inhabitants of Congressional Township No. 11, & C. v. Weir
... ... to 100 dollars, a judgment for 102 dollars and 36 cents in ... one case, and for 102 dollars in another, was sustained ... State v. Westbrook, 7 Blackf. 138; ... State v. Burnside, 7 Blackf. 577 ... [3]. There is no material difference in ... the phraseology of the two ... ...
- Rogers v. State