Horner v. Chamberlain
Decision Date | 18 April 1906 |
Citation | 85 P. 927,12 Idaho 304 |
Parties | FRED J. HORNER, Appellant, v. A. V. CHAMBERLAIN et al., Respondents |
Court | Idaho Supreme Court |
APPEAL from the District Court of the First Judicial District for Kootenai County. Hon. Ralph T. Morgan, Judge.
Action for malicious prosecution. Demurrer to complaint sustained and judgment of dismissal entered. Reversed.
Reversed and remanded, with direction. Costs awarded to appellant.
This action was commenced to recover damages for malicious prosecution, and the pleadings and questions involved herein are substantially the same as in the case of Wm. J. Russell, Appellant, v. A. V. Chamberlain et al., Respondents, decided at this term of this court and reported in 85 P. 926, (ante, p. 299), and by stipulation of counsel this case was the follow the decision in the said case of Russell v. Chamberlain. On the authority of that case, the judgment in this case must be reversed and the case remanded, with direction to the trial court to overrule the demurrers and to give the respondents a reasonable time in which to answer. Costs awarded to appellant.
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Luther v. First Bank of Troy
... ... part of the appellants, want of probable cause for the ... prosecution alleged to have been malicious. (Russell v ... Chamberlain, 12 Idaho 299, 85 P. 926; Horner v ... Chamberlain, 12 Idaho 304, 85 P. 927; Nettleton v ... Cook, 30 Idaho 82, 163 P. 300; Castles v ... ...
-
Donaldson v. Miller
...for the prosecution alleged to have been malicious (Russell v. Chamberlain, 12 Idaho 299, 85 P. 926, 9 Ann. Cas. 1173; Horner v. Chamberlain, 12 Idaho 304, 85 P. 927; Nettleton v. Cook, 30 Idaho 82, 163 P. 300, L. R. 1917D, 1194; Castles v. Lynch, 36 Idaho 636, 212 P. 970; Lowe v. Skaggs Sa......