Horvath v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town of Torrington

Decision Date08 June 1972
Citation163 Conn. 609,316 A.2d 418
CourtConnecticut Supreme Court
PartiesStella HORVATH et al. v. ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF the TOWN OF TORRINGTON et al.

Peter K. Sivaslian, Torrington, for appellants (plaintiffs).

Victor M. Muschell, Torrington, for the appellee (defendant John Erichetti Associates); with him, on the brief, was Harry Ossen, Corporation Counsel, for the appellee (named defendant).

Before HOUSE, C.J., and RYAN, SHAPIRO, LOISELLE and MacDONALD, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from the granting of a special exception under the zoning ordinances of the town of Torrington permitting the erection of a multi-family dwelling group.

There was conflicting evidence before the zoning board of appeals and the trial court could not substitute its judgment for that of the board. Sobol v. Planning & Zoning Commission, 158 Conn. 623, 262 A.2d 185. The appeal record discloses that there was competent and sufficient evidence before the board to justify the result reached. The trial court was correct in concluding that the plaintiffs failed to sustain the burden of proving that the board acted illegally, arbitrarily or in abuse of its discretion.

There is no error.

To continue reading

Request your trial
12 cases
  • Double I Ltd. Partnership v. Plan and Zoning Com'n of Town of Glastonbury
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • March 19, 1991
    ...is borne by the plaintiffs. Whittaker v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 179 Conn. 650, 654, 427 A.2d 1346 (1980); Horvath v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 163 Conn. 609, 316 A.2d 418 (1972). Although we note that the transcript of the hearing provides some support for the plaintiffs' position, on the ......
  • Whittaker v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town of Trumbull
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • February 19, 1980
    ...A.2d 687 (1965). The burden of proof to demonstrate that the board acted improperly is upon the plaintiffs. Horvath v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 163 Conn. 609, 316 A.2d 418 (1972); Thorne v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 156 Conn. 619, 621, 238 A.2d 400 (1968); Talmadge v. Zoning Board of Appeals......
  • Adolphson v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town of Fairfield
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • January 5, 1988
    ...A.2d 110 (1964). "The burden of proof to demonstrate that the board acted improperly is upon the plaintiffs. Horvath v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 163 Conn. 609, 316 A.2d 418 (1972); Thorne v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 156 Conn. 619, 621, 238 A.2d 400 (1968); Talmadge v. Zoning Board of Appeal......
  • Fedorich v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals of Town of Torrington
    • United States
    • Connecticut Supreme Court
    • August 7, 1979
    ...In reviewing the record, the trial court could not substitute its own judgment for that of the zoning authority; Horvath v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 163 Conn. 609, 316 A.2d 418; Summ v. Zoning Commission, 150 Conn. 79, 89, 186 A.2d 160; and because the local authority is closer to the circu......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT