Hosey v. Workmen's Compensation Commissioner

Decision Date15 November 1966
Docket NumberNo. 12580,12580
Citation151 W.Va. 172,151 S.E.2d 729
CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court
PartiesRalph M. HOSEY v. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION COMMISSIONER et al.

Syllabus by the Court

This Court will not reverse a finding of fact made by the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board unless it appears from the proof upon which the appeal board acted that the finding is plainly wrong.

Jeter, Jeter & Jeter, James C. Jeter, Charleston, for appellant.

No counsel for appellees.

CALHOUN, Judge:

In this case, styled Ralph M. Hosey v. Workmen's Compensation Commissioner and Pardee and Curtin Lumber Company, the claimant, Ralph M. Hosey, has appealed to this Court from an order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board entered on May 5, 1966, affirming an order of the Workmen's Compensation Commissioner entered on December 17, 1965, by which a previous award of workmen's compensation benefits in favor of the claimant was increased from fifty percent to sixty percent.

The basic question presented for decision is whether the appeal board erred in not making an award of total permanent disability benefits.

Ralph M. Hosey, the claimant, sustained an injury to his back and right hip on August 20, 1958, as a result of a 'rock fall' while he was employed in the employer's coal mine in Webster County. While it is clear from the record that the claimant is physically unable to perform heavy manual labor, the appeal board was of the opinion that his disability is not wholly 'injury-connected.'

The claimant originally received an award of twenty percent. On subsequent reopenings, he received awards of thirty-five percent and fifty percent before he received the award of sixty percent from which he has prosecuted this appeal.

The claim was last reopened on June 16, 1965, upon reports of Dr. Joseph P. Seltzer and Dr. Harold H. Kuhn. Dr. Seltzer's report, dated May 28, 1965, recommended an additional five percent above the previous award of fifty percent. In his report he stated: 'There seems to be objective worsening in this case. There is marked disability. This man is obviously unable to work. * * * I am unable to relate the neck complaints to the injuries sustained as from the objective point of view the findings are consistent with this man's age.' Dr. Kuhn examined the claimant on June 8, 1965, and recommended an additional award of five percent. In a report dated August 13, 1965, Dr. Robert S. Wilson stated: 'There is evidence there has been gradual progressing of arthrities of the right hip, and a history of increased pain in the hip and back. * * *.' He stated that, in his opinion, the claimant had a fifty-five percent permanent partial disability. In an X-ray report made by Dr. J. D. H. Wilson on August 9, 1965, he stated: 'Examination of the right hip shows some degenerative arthritis of the right hip joint. When the present examination is compared with that of 1964 no significant change is noted in the amount of degenerative arthritis.'

On September 1, 1965, the commissioner made an award of five eprcent in addition to the fifty percent award previously made. This finding was protested by the claimant and at a hearing held on November 5, 1965, the claimant introduced reports of Dr. C. W. Stallard, Dr. Harold H. Kuhn and Dr. J. N. Kurish, D. O. In his report dated November 2, 1965, Dr. Kurish stated: 'In my opinion patient is totally and permanently disabled from performing a regular and gainful occupation. He should have a disability rating of one hundred percent.' The report also noted that an X-ray examination revealed severe arthritis of the entire spine and both hip joints. In a report dated October 26, 1965, Dr. Stallard stated: 'It is my opinion that this patient's condition has grown progressively worse since my last examination. His pain has grown worse, the instability of the right lower extremity is worse and he cannot stoop or flex the spine. He has to have someone put his shoe on the right lower extremity. I know of no treatment at this time that will help this man. He is 66 years of age and probably could not pass a physical examination for any employment. However, a good deal of his trouble is due to his age and his arthritis of the spine. From the standpoint of doing any gainful occupation or returning to the type of work he is used to doing before he was injured, he is totally and permanently disabled. I would suggest that his compensation be increased to 60 per cent.' In his report dated October 13, 1965, Dr. Kuhn stated that '* * * this man could not do heavy manual work.' On this state of the record, the commissioner made the award of sixty percent which...

To continue reading

Request your trial
8 cases
  • Repass v. WORKERS'COMPENSATION DIV.
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • 28 Junio 2002
    ...730 (1969); Dunlap v. State Workmen's Comp. Comm'r, 152 W.Va. 359, 364, 163 S.E.2d 605, 608 (1968); Hosey v. Workmen's Comp. Comm'r, 151 W.Va. 172, 176, 151 S.E.2d 729, 731 (1966); Syl. pt. 1, Deverick v. State Comp. Dir., 150 W.Va. 145, 144 S.E.2d 498 (1965). In the instant case, the major......
  • Sisk v. State Workmen's Compensation Commissioner
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • 2 Diciembre 1969
    ...proof, it is the duty of the commissioner to construe liberally the evidence in favor of the claimant. Hosey v. Workmen's Compensation Commissioner, 151 W.Va. 172, 151 S.E.2d 729; Dombrosky v. State Compensation Director, 149 W.Va. 343, 141 S.E.2d 85; Justice v. State Compensation Director,......
  • Dodson v. WORKERS'COMPENSATION DIV.
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • 8 Noviembre 2001
    ...W.Va. 277, 145 S.E.2d 29 (1965). With regard to findings of fact of the WCAB, we stated in the syllabus of Hosey v. Workmen's Compensation Comm'r, 151 W.Va. 172, 151 S.E.2d 729 (1966), "This Court will not reverse a finding of fact made by the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board unless it a......
  • Jordan v. State Workmen's Compensation Commissioner
    • United States
    • West Virginia Supreme Court
    • 9 Octubre 1972
    ...(1970); Richardson v. State Workmen's Compensation Commissioner, 153 W.Va. 454, 170 S.E.2d 221 (1969); Hosey v. Workmen's Compensation Commissioner, 151 W.Va. 172, 51 S.E.2d 729 (1966); McGeary v. State Compensation Director, 148 W.Va. 436, 135 S.E.2d 345 (1964); Stone v. Compensation Appea......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT