Hosey v. Workmen's Compensation Commissioner
Decision Date | 15 November 1966 |
Docket Number | No. 12580,12580 |
Citation | 151 W.Va. 172,151 S.E.2d 729 |
Court | West Virginia Supreme Court |
Parties | Ralph M. HOSEY v. WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION COMMISSIONER et al. |
Syllabus by the Court
This Court will not reverse a finding of fact made by the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board unless it appears from the proof upon which the appeal board acted that the finding is plainly wrong.
Jeter, Jeter & Jeter, James C. Jeter, Charleston, for appellant.
No counsel for appellees.
In this case, styled Ralph M. Hosey v. Workmen's Compensation Commissioner and Pardee and Curtin Lumber Company, the claimant, Ralph M. Hosey, has appealed to this Court from an order of the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board entered on May 5, 1966, affirming an order of the Workmen's Compensation Commissioner entered on December 17, 1965, by which a previous award of workmen's compensation benefits in favor of the claimant was increased from fifty percent to sixty percent.
The basic question presented for decision is whether the appeal board erred in not making an award of total permanent disability benefits.
Ralph M. Hosey, the claimant, sustained an injury to his back and right hip on August 20, 1958, as a result of a 'rock fall' while he was employed in the employer's coal mine in Webster County. While it is clear from the record that the claimant is physically unable to perform heavy manual labor, the appeal board was of the opinion that his disability is not wholly 'injury-connected.'
The claimant originally received an award of twenty percent. On subsequent reopenings, he received awards of thirty-five percent and fifty percent before he received the award of sixty percent from which he has prosecuted this appeal.
The claim was last reopened on June 16, 1965, upon reports of Dr. Joseph P. Seltzer and Dr. Harold H. Kuhn. Dr. Seltzer's report, dated May 28, 1965, recommended an additional five percent above the previous award of fifty percent. In his report he stated: Dr. Kuhn examined the claimant on June 8, 1965, and recommended an additional award of five percent. In a report dated August 13, 1965, Dr. Robert S. Wilson stated: 'There is evidence there has been gradual progressing of arthrities of the right hip, and a history of increased pain in the hip and back. * * *.' He stated that, in his opinion, the claimant had a fifty-five percent permanent partial disability. In an X-ray report made by Dr. J. D. H. Wilson on August 9, 1965, he stated:
On September 1, 1965, the commissioner made an award of five eprcent in addition to the fifty percent award previously made. This finding was protested by the claimant and at a hearing held on November 5, 1965, the claimant introduced reports of Dr. C. W. Stallard, Dr. Harold H. Kuhn and Dr. J. N. Kurish, D. O. In his report dated November 2, 1965, Dr. Kurish stated: The report also noted that an X-ray examination revealed severe arthritis of the entire spine and both hip joints. In a report dated October 26, 1965, Dr. Stallard stated: In his report dated October 13, 1965, Dr. Kuhn stated that '* * * this man could not do heavy manual work.' On this state of the record, the commissioner made the award of sixty percent which...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Repass v. WORKERS'COMPENSATION DIV.
...730 (1969); Dunlap v. State Workmen's Comp. Comm'r, 152 W.Va. 359, 364, 163 S.E.2d 605, 608 (1968); Hosey v. Workmen's Comp. Comm'r, 151 W.Va. 172, 176, 151 S.E.2d 729, 731 (1966); Syl. pt. 1, Deverick v. State Comp. Dir., 150 W.Va. 145, 144 S.E.2d 498 (1965). In the instant case, the major......
-
Sisk v. State Workmen's Compensation Commissioner
...proof, it is the duty of the commissioner to construe liberally the evidence in favor of the claimant. Hosey v. Workmen's Compensation Commissioner, 151 W.Va. 172, 151 S.E.2d 729; Dombrosky v. State Compensation Director, 149 W.Va. 343, 141 S.E.2d 85; Justice v. State Compensation Director,......
-
Dodson v. WORKERS'COMPENSATION DIV.
...W.Va. 277, 145 S.E.2d 29 (1965). With regard to findings of fact of the WCAB, we stated in the syllabus of Hosey v. Workmen's Compensation Comm'r, 151 W.Va. 172, 151 S.E.2d 729 (1966), "This Court will not reverse a finding of fact made by the Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board unless it a......
-
Jordan v. State Workmen's Compensation Commissioner
...(1970); Richardson v. State Workmen's Compensation Commissioner, 153 W.Va. 454, 170 S.E.2d 221 (1969); Hosey v. Workmen's Compensation Commissioner, 151 W.Va. 172, 51 S.E.2d 729 (1966); McGeary v. State Compensation Director, 148 W.Va. 436, 135 S.E.2d 345 (1964); Stone v. Compensation Appea......