Hospital for Joint Diseases v. Allstate Insurance Company
Decision Date | 08 March 2004 |
Docket Number | 2003-01399. |
Citation | 2004 NY Slip Op 01546,773 N.Y.S.2d 427,5 A.D.3d 441 |
Parties | HOSPITAL FOR JOINT DISEASES, as Assignee of IRENE ALLEN, Appellant, v. ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. |
Court | New York Supreme Court — Appellate Division |
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The plaintiff Hospital for Joint Diseases, as assignee of its patient, alleged in its complaint that the defendant no-fault insurer was liable for two no-fault claims which were mailed on March 6, 2002, because it neither paid nor denied the claims within 30 days of receipt, as required by Insurance Law § 5106 (a) and the corresponding regulation of the Insurance Department, 11 NYCRR 65.15 (g) (3). Thereafter, the plaintiff made the same argument in a motion for summary judgment.
The defendant cross-moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint, submitting evidence that before the medical services at issue were rendered, it had notified the plaintiff's assignor that it had terminated her no-fault benefits based upon an independent medical examination, and that the plaintiff had previously submitted claims for these same billings which the defendant timely denied. The Supreme Court denied the plaintiff's motion, granted the defendant's cross motion, and dismissed the complaint. The plaintiff appeals.
We affirm. Under the no-fault law, a claimant whose claim for benefits has been denied is entitled to "seek immediate redress, and to recover both the amount of any overdue claim and reasonable attorney's fees in securing payment" (Roggio v Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 66 NY2d 260, 262 [1985]). A claimant may either file suit seeking payment of the claim, or, pursuant to Insurance Law § 5106 (b), submit the dispute to arbitration, pursuant to simplified procedures promulgated by the Insurance Department. In this case, the plaintiff did neither, opting instead to repeatedly resubmit the denied claims, apparently in the hope that eventually the defendant would fail to issue a denial within 30 days of receipt. We hold, however, that the 30-day period in which to deny a claim for no-fault benefits...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Sky Med. Supply Inc. v. SCS Support Claims Servs., Inc.
...recover both the amount of any overdue claim and reasonable attorney's fees in securing payment.’ ” Hosp. for Joint Diseases v. Allstate Ins. Co., 5 A.D.3d 441, 773 N.Y.S.2d 427, 428 (2004) (quoting Roggio v. Nationwide Mut. Ins. Co., 66 N.Y.2d 260, 262, 496 N.Y.S.2d 404, 487 N.E.2d 261 (19......
-
Ruggerio v. Dynamic Elec. Sys. Inc.
... ... an electrical contracting and engineering company located in Brooklyn, New York. Compl. 7 ... ...
- 159 Smith, LLC v. Boreum Hill Prop. Holdings, LLC
-
Mount Sinai Hosp. v. N.Y. Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.
...commence the 30–day clock anew by submitting the same claim several months later ( see Hospital for Joint Diseases v. Allstate Ins. Co., 5 A.D.3d 441, 442, 773 N.Y.S.2d 427). We conclude that the Supreme Court erred in denying Mount Sinai's motion for summary judgment on the complaint and i......