Hotz v. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Mo.
Decision Date | 13 December 1939 |
Docket Number | No. 11459.,11459. |
Citation | 108 F.2d 216 |
Parties | HOTZ v. FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF KANSAS CITY, MO. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
William J. Hotz and Hotz & Hotz, all of Omaha, Neb., for appellant.
William A. Schall and Edward G. Garvey, both of Omaha, Neb., for appellee.
Before THOMAS and VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judges, and DEWEY, District Judge.
Appellant seeks to reverse an order of the district court for the District of Nebraska, in proceedings under section 77B, 11 U.S.C.A. § 207, p. 1057, 48 Stat. 912, allowing in full, and as an expense of administration, a claim for rental of office rooms from appellee. The amount in controversy is $770. The facts were stipulated and can best be stated in the language of the court's findings:
Upon the facts thus found the court announced the following conclusions of law:
In their brief counsel for appellant urge what are designated as four points of law, the substance of which is that, where a lease has been terminated by nonadoption, rejection, and surrender of the premises, the landlord has a claim for damages and the measure of damages is the difference between the rental agreed upon, in the lease for the fixed period and the actual rental value of the premises for such term at the time of the breach. It is insisted that neither the statute nor rules of court provide any special form of notice of rejection, nonadoption, or surrender, and that it is sufficient if the landlord is free to deal with the property as he chooses regardless of whether there was a technical surrender. It is contended that Section 207, sub. b, 11 U.S.C.A. page 1061, etc., supplies the procedure for the ascertainment of such damages in reference to unexpired leases after a petition for reorganization is filed and approved, and that said section has been reasonably and substantially complied with by appellant in the instant case. A further contention is that, with respect to allowances in prior receivership proceedings, the judge under 77B shall make such orders as he may deem equitable respecting administrative expenses in the prior proceedings "as may be fixed by the court appointing said receiver or prior trustee"; and that the action of the court in making the order of allowance from which this appeal is taken is not in law the approval of a claim in the receivership proceedings after the filing and approval of a petition in bankruptcy under 77B.
It will be observed that counsel for appellant base their assignment, that the trial court erred in allowing the claim of appellee, upon the contention that there was a surrender by operation of law when the trustee in bankruptcy abandoned the premises and...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Rauth v. Dennison
... ... Roll, 43 Mo.App. 234, 238-239(1); Hotz v. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Mo., 8 ... ...
-
Butzel v. Webster Apartments Co.
...not violating or impairing contractual obligations. Pepper v. Litton, 308 U.S. 295, 305, 60 S.Ct. 238, 84 L.Ed. 281; Hotz v. Federal Reserve Bank, 8 Cir., 108 F.2d 216; Gross v. Bush Terminal Company, 2 Cir., 105 F.2d 930; Kalb v. Feuerstein, 308 U.S. 433, 439, 60 S.Ct. 343, 84 L.Ed. 370; U......
-
Central Nebraska Public Power & Irr. Dist. v. Harrison
...405, 49 S.Ct. 360, 73 L.Ed. 762; Erie R. Co. v. Tompkins, 304 U.S. 64, 58 S.Ct. 817, 82 L.Ed. 1188, 114 A.L.R. 1487; Hotz v. Federal Reserve Bank, 8 Cir., 108 F.2d 216; Feltz v. Central Nebraska Power District, 8 Cir., 124 F.2d The District commenced its condemnation proceedings on March 27......
-
In the Matter of National Gypsum Co.
...judge with reference to the filing of claims by creditors[.] Consolidated Gas, 85 F.2d at 805; see also Hotz v. Fed. Reserve Bank of Kansas City, 108 F.2d 216, 219 (8th Cir. 1939); In DeVlieg, Inc., No. 93-C-20104, 1993 WL 248205, at *2 (N.D. Ill. July 6, 1993). Finally, it should be noted ......