Household Finance Corp v. Director of Division of Taxation, Department of Treasury of New Jersey

Decision Date08 October 1962
Docket NumberNo. 237,237
Citation9 L.Ed.2d 49,83 S.Ct. 41,371 U.S. 13
PartiesHOUSEHOLD FINANCE CORP. v. DIRECTOR OF DIVISION OF TAXATION, DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY OF NEW JERSEY
CourtU.S. Supreme Court

Roger C. Ward, for appellant.

Arthur J. Sills, Atty. Gen. of New Jersey, and Alan B. Handler, Deputy Atty. Gen., for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was taken as a petition for writ of certiorari, certiorari is denied.

Mr. Justice GOLDBERG took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

To continue reading

Request your trial
26 cases
  • Cooper v. Eugene School Dist. No. 4J
    • United States
    • Supreme Court of Oregon
    • July 29, 1986
    ......Employment Division, 301 Or. 209, 721 P.2d 445 (1986) and Black v. ...No money shall be drawn from the Treasury for the benefit of any religeous (sic), or ... "the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is," Marbury v. Madison, 5 ... thereof; and no money raised by taxation in any State for the support of public schools, ......
  • Kay By and Through Disselbrett v. David Douglas School Dist. No. 40, 40
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Oregon
    • May 21, 1986
    ......    "No money shall be drawn from the treasury for the benefit of any religeous [sic ] or ......
  • Powell v. Bunn
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Oregon
    • December 11, 2002
    ......ORCP 47 C; Jones v. General Motors Corp., 325 Or. 404, 420, 939 P.2d 608 (1997) . On ..., § 5 ("No money shall be drawn from the Treasury for the benefit of any religeous ( sic ), or ......
  • Utsey v. Coos County
    • United States
    • Court of Appeals of Oregon
    • September 26, 2001
    ......, Albert Lillie, Cindy Lillie, and Department of Land Conservation and Development, ...466, 80 L.Ed. 688 (1936) ; New Jersey v. Sargent, 269 U.S. 328, 46 S.Ct. 122, 70 L.Ed. ..., naming as the respondent the Director of the Department of Transportation. The ...Kulongoski (Elections Division # 13), 322 Or. 15, 25-26, 902 P.2d 1143 (1995) ...Corp. v. United States, 307 U.S. 125, 131 n. 9, 59 ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT