Houser v. State ex rel. Bent
Decision Date | 14 December 1915 |
Docket Number | No. 22823.,22823. |
Citation | 110 N.E. 665,184 Ind. 88 |
Parties | HOUSER et al. v. STATE ex rel. BENT et al. |
Court | Indiana Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from Circuit Court, Miami County; Joseph N. Tillett, Judge.
Action by the State, on the relation of Walter S. Bent, Commissioner, etc., and others against Burvia A. Houser and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants appeal. Transferred from Appellate Court under section 1405, Burns 1914. Reversed, with instructions.
Albert Ward, of Peru, and A. N. McCracken, D. F. Brooks, and W. G. Todd, all of Wabash, for appellants. Walter S. Bent and Alvah Taylor, both of Wabash, for appellees.
The sole question properly presented by this appeal may be thus stated: Are the sureties on a bond executed by a county surveyor as drainage commissioner ex officio, pursuant to the provisions of section 6140, Burns 1914, liable for the defalcation of their principal while he is acting as commissioner of construction under the provisions of section 6143, Burns 1914? Section 6140, supra, being section 1 of the drainage law of 1907 (Acts 1907, p. 508), provides that:
It further provides that the-
“county surveyor shall be ex officio a drainage commissioner, and shall give a bond as above required of the drainage commissioner in addition to his ordinary official bond.”
Section 3 of the same act provides for the appointment by the court of a third drainage commissioner who shall act with the commissioners above provided for, whenever a drainage petition is referred to them for investigation and report.
Section 4 of said act, which is section 6143, supra, provides that whenever the court enters an order establishing the improvement prayed for, it shall assign the proposed work-
“to one of the three commissioners above provided for, for construction, or the court may assign it for construction to any disinterested freeholder, of the county, who shall, before entering upon his duties, take and subscribe an oath of office and give bond, payable to the state of Indiana, in such sum as the court may require, conditioned that he will honestly and faithfully perform his duties and account for all moneys that may come into his hands.”
The decision of the question above stated depends on whether the office of ...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Maryland Casualty Co. v. Town of Terry
...as night watchman. 50 C. J. 124; Alcorn v. State, 57 Miss. 273; Pickle v. Brooks, 162 Miss. 87; Robinson v. State, 47 Miss. 423; Houser v. State, 110 N.E. 665; v. Hudson, 55 S.W.2d 388; State v. Thomas, 12 S.W.2d 1034; U.S. v. Cheeseman, Fed. Cas. No. 14, 790. H. V. Watkins and Ralph B. Ave......