Houston & T. C. R. Co. v. Alexander.

Decision Date30 November 1910
CitationHouston & T. C. R. Co. v. Alexander., 132 S.W. 119, 103 Tex. 594 (Tex. 1910)
PartiesHOUSTON & T. C. R. CO. v. ALEXANDER et al.
CourtTexas Supreme Court

Action by Eliza E. Alexander and others against the Houston & Texas Central Railroad Company. Judgment of the Court of Civil Appeals (121 S. W. 602) affirming a judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant brings error. Reversed and rendered.

Baker, Botts, Parker & Garwood and Head, Dillard, Smith & Head, for plaintiff in error. John H. Sharp and J. H. Wood, for defendants in error.

WILLIAMS, J.

The deceased, whose death was the occasion of this action by the defendants in error for damages, was killed by a fall from the tender of one of defendant's engines at Sherman. There is no dispute or uncertainty whatever about the facts. It was the duty of deceased to put fuel oil in the oil tank of the engine at night when it came into Sherman from the South. His custom, and that of all who performed such service, was to enter the cab of the engine, ascend from its gangway to the top of the tender, or watertank, and walk along it until reaching a wooden box, to be described presently, then to step on the box and from it to the top of the oil tank, which stood on top of the watertank, but did not cover its entire width. After the oil had been let into the tank, the descent was made over the same way. In making the descent on the night in question, the deceased stepped from the top of the oil tank to that of the box and, his foot slipping, fell to the ground and was fatally hurt. The box was one of two, exactly alike, which were parts of the regular equipment of such engines, and were fastened beside the oil tanks to the top of the watertank, or tender. It was lower than the top of the oil tank, so that it was convenient to use it as a step in going up and down. It was built to contain tools used by the engineer, and, in order to turn water when it rained, its covering consisted of two lids which formed an apex over the center of the box and descended very gradually to the eaves, like a gently sloping gable roof. Grease and dirt accumulated on the lids from several causes, viz., from the feet of men walking over them with oil or grease and dirt on their shoes, from the occasional spilling of oil in filling the tank, and from the escape of it through air and gas vents or pipes in the tank and the settling of dust or cinders in running, and it is asserted that this condition was the cause of Alexander's foot slipping. All the witnesses say that the boxes were like those used on oil burning engines generally, that all of them soon came to be in the condition described, and that there was nothing unusual in this respect in the one on which Alexander slipped. He had been employed in the railroad service for 16 years, had been car inspector and repairer, had occasionally supplied engines with oil in daylight, and had been regularly engaged in doing that service at night six weeks or two months. On account of the use of oil as fuel for the engines, it with dirt or cinders was necessarily on and about other parts of engines and tanks where men had to pass, and the evidence shows that there was nothing peculiar in this particular in the condition of the top of the box. There is some very indefinite testimony to the effect that one of the engineers when he saw fresh grease on the box would wipe it off, and that at Ennis, the next division point south of Sherman, the employés "sometimes wiped off the tool boxes and all the top of the tank."...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
19 cases
  • Bering Mfg. Co. v. Sedita
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • November 15, 1919
    ...the servant, exonerate the master from liability for negligence as a matter of law? Until the recent case of H. & T. C. Railroad Co. v. Alexander, supra [103 Tex. 594, 132 S. W. 119], we would have assumed that Texas was committed to a negative answer of that question, under such well-known......
  • Cameron Compress Co. v. Whitington
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • February 17, 1926
    ...effect, at least in the absence of evidence tending to show the custom itself is unreasonable. They cite Houston & T. C. Ry. Co. v. Alexander, 132 S. W. 119, 103 Tex. 594; Taylor v. White (Tex. Com. App.) 212 S. W. 656; Bering Mfg. Co. v. Sedita (Tex. Civ. App.) 216 S. W. 639; Morgan v. Sti......
  • Brown v. Lundell
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • February 22, 1961
    ...their business, and that they discharged their legal obligations for the safety of their servants. (Houston & T. C.) Railway Co. v. Alexander, 103 Tex. 594, 132 S.W. 119; (Canadian Northern) Railway Co. v. Senske, 201 Fed. 637, 120 C.C.A. The court is not saying that the proper jury issue s......
  • Coca-Cola Bottling Co. of Fort Worth v. Smith
    • United States
    • Texas Court of Appeals
    • September 18, 1936
    ...use of the instrumentalities, he may be declared as a matter of law to have been in the exercise of due care. Houston & T. C. Railway Co. v. Alexander, 103 Tex. 594, 132 S. W. 119; Southern Pacific R. Co. v. Seley, 152 U.S. 145, 14 S.Ct. 530, 38 L.Ed. 391; 1 Labatt on Master & Servant, §§ 4......
  • Get Started for Free