Houston v. Lowes of Savannah, Inc.

Decision Date16 September 1975
Docket NumberNo. 30154,30154
Citation219 S.E.2d 115,235 Ga. 201
PartiesD. C. HOUSTON v. LOWES OF SAVANNAH, INC., et al.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

Burt, Burt & Rentz, D. D. Rentz, William L. Swan, Albany, Twitty & Twitty, Frank S. Twitty, Camilla, for appellant.

Perry, Walters, Lippitt & Custer, S. B. Lippitt, Jr., Albany, for appellees.

HILL, Justice.

The Court of Appeals has certified two questions, as follows:

(1) Does Code Ann. § 81A-155(b) 1 provide two grounds (providential cause and excusable neglect) or three grounds (providential cause, excusable neglect, and where the judge from all the facts determines that a proper case has been made) for opening default?

(2) If the answer to question number 1 above is three grounds, did the record in the above-styled case authorize the exercise of a legal discretion by the trial judge?

Code Ann. § 81A-155(b) is identical to the 1946 amendment (Ga.L.1946, pp. 761, 778) to Code (1933) § 110-404 and identical for purposes of this case to Code (1933) § 110-404 and its predecessors, Code (1910) § 5656 and Code (1895) § 5072, all stating the grounds for opening defaults. Cases construing the provisions of those sections are thus equally applicable to Code Ann. § 81A-155(b).

We find the possibility for confusion and of conflict in the case law interpreting § 5072 of the Code of 1895 and its successors. Manry v. Twitty, 132 Ga. 478, 64 S.E. 273, and Martin v. Shields, 144 Ga. 179, 86 S.E. 538, are both full bench decisions of this court. In both cases motions to open defaults were denied by the trial courts and, on appeal, those rulings were affirmed because the movants had failed to show either (1) providential cause or (2) excusable neglect. Those decisions thus appear to hold that the statute provides only the two grounds specifically mentioned. On the other hand, it could be that having lost before the trial judge, the movants relied only on these two grounds on appeal.

Other cases quote or paraphrase the three grounds for opening defaults listed in the statute. Brucker v. O'Connor, 115 Ga. 95, 41 S.E. 245; Ingalls v. Lamar, 115 Ga. 296(2), 41 S.E. 573; Sanders v. American Liberty Insurance Co., 225 Ga. 796, 171 S.E.2d 539. These decisions reversed the rulings of the trial courts and hence it was necessary to state the grounds on which the trial courts might have based their decisions. 2 However, these decisions were not 'full bench,' one Justice or more being absent or disqualified in each case.

A more recent decision is Axelroad v. Preston, 232 Ga. 836, 209 S.E.2d 178, a full bench decision, expressly recognizing that there are three statutory grounds for opening defaults and basing the decision on the 'third ground.' In that case, the movant was allowed to open the default on a showing that his attorney had been hospitalized for heart surgery. This court affirmed the trial court, stating that the trial judge's determination that a proper case had been made for the default to be opened was not an abuse of his discretion 'even though there was no providential cause or excusable neglect.'

Axelroad thus refused to construe the trial court's discretion in opening defaults as narrowly as some earlier cases seemingly did. Axelroad gave effect to the third ground of Code Ann. § 81A-155(b) as enacted by the General Assembly. It is a well-established principle that a statute must be viewed so as to make all its parts harmonize and to give a sensible and intelligent effect to each part. It is not presumed that the legislature intended that any part would be without meaning. Drake v. Drewery, 109 Ga. 399, 401, 35 S.E. 44. Thus, Axelroad is in harmony not only with the rules of statutory construction but also the spirit of the Civil Practice Act of which Code Ann. § 81A-155(b) is a part.

To the extent, if any, that the decisions of this court in Manry v. Twitty and Martin v. Shields, supra, or the language of Brucker v. O'Connor, supra, may be in conflict with Axelroad, they are hereby overruled. The fact that Manry and Martin were 'full bench' decisions is no longer a controlling factor. Hall v. Hopper, 234 Ga. 625(3), 216 S.E.2d 839. Axelroad being later in time is the more persuasive decision. Hall v. Hopper, supra.

The second question calls for a determination and application of facts disposing of the entire case and should not be answered by this court in response to a certified question. City of Trenton v. Dade County, 202 Ga. 190, 42 S.E.2d 438; Gunby v. Roberts, 205 Ga. 346, 53 S.E.2d 370; Kelly v. Ga. Casualty & Surety Co., 216 Ga. 834, 120 S.E.2d 329.

Although appellant and some members of the Court of Appeals have objected to the...

To continue reading

Request your trial
82 cases
  • White v. State
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • February 4, 2019
    ...holding." (Punctuation omitted; emphasis supplied.) The Law of Judicial Precedent, supra, at 300. See also Houston v. Lowes of Savannah, Inc., 235 Ga. 201, 203, 219 S.E.2d 115 (1975) (When faced with its own conflicting decisions, the Georgia Supreme Court’s more recent case was controlling......
  • Gilbert v. Richardson
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • November 21, 1994
    ...each part[, as i]t is not presumed that the legislature intended that any part would be without meaning." Houston v. Lowes of Savannah, Inc., 235 Ga. 201, 203, 219 S.E.2d 115 (1975). Subsection (a) of the 1991 amendment authorizes the legislature to "waive the state's sovereign immunity fro......
  • City of Marietta v. Summerour
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • October 30, 2017
    ...462 (2) (b), 759 S.E.2d 857 (2014) ; Hendry v. Hendry, 292 Ga. 1, 3 (1), 734 S.E.2d 46 (2012). See also Houston v. Lowes of Savannah, Inc., 235 Ga. 201, 203, 219 S.E.2d 115 (1975) ("[A] statute must be viewed so as to make all its parts harmonize and to give a sensible and intelligent effec......
  • Bowen v. Savoy
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • February 28, 2020
    ...'s requirement of a "reasonable excuse" is dispositive only in the excusable neglect context. See Houston v. Lowes of Savannah, Inc. , 235 Ga. 201, 202 n.2, 219 S.E.2d 115 (1975). Brucker 's decontextualized language has unfortunately resulted in the emergence of a tangle of competing, and ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • When Wrong Is Right: Stare Decisis in the Supreme Court of Georgia
    • United States
    • State Bar of Georgia Georgia Bar Journal No. 21-4, December 2015
    • Invalid date
    ...judgments." [34] 234 Ga. 625, 216 S.E.2d 839 (1975). [35] Id. at 631, 216 S.E.2d at 843; accord Houston v. Lowes of Savannah, Inc., 235 Ga. 201, 203, 219 S.E.2d 115, 116 (1975). [36] 234 Ga. at 631, 216 S.E.2d at 843. [37] Id. at 632, 216 S.E.2d at 843. The Court of Appeals of Georgia subse......
  • Administrative Law - Martin M. Wilson and Jennifer A. Blackburn
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 59-1, September 2007
    • Invalid date
    ...persuasive'" rule is the one that appears later in time. Massey, 281 Ga. at 246, 637 S.E.2d at 387 (quoting Houston v. Lowes of Savannah, 235 Ga. 201, 203, 219 S.E.2d 115, 116 (1975)). 8. 245 Ga. 519, 265 S.E.2d 811 (1980). 9. Massey, 281 Ga. at 246, 637 S.E.2d at 387 (citing Tate, 245 Ga. ......
  • Doubling Down: Supreme Court of Georgia Allows for Seemingly Double Recovery of Attorney's Fees
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 74-5, August 2023
    • Invalid date
    ...645, 807 S.E.2d at 324.71. Id. at 649, 807 S.E.2d at 328.72. Id. at 654, 807 S.E.2d at 331.73. Id.74. Houston v. Lowes of Savannah, Inc., 235 Ga. 201, 219 S.E.2d 115 (1975).75. Id. at 203, 219 S.E.2d at 116. 76. Id.77. Marx v. Gen. Revenue Corp., 568 U.S. 371, 382 (2013).78. 568 U.S. 371 (2......
  • Trial Practice and Procedure
    • United States
    • Mercer University School of Law Mercer Law Reviews No. 72-1, September 2020
    • Invalid date
    ...208, 839 S.E.2d at 550 (internal citations omitted).34. 115 Ga. 95, 41 S.E. 245 (1902), overruled by Houston v. Lowes of Savannah, Inc., 235 Ga. 201, 219 S.E.2d 115 (1975).35. 293 Ga. App. 247, 666 S.E.2d 699 (2008).36. Bowen, 308 Ga. at 208, 839 S.E.2d at 550 (quoting BellSouth, 293 Ga. Ap......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT