Houston v. Moore
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
| Writing for the Court | Ingersoll |
| Citation | Houston v. Moore, 3 Wheat. 433, 16 U.S. 433, 4 L.Ed. 428 (1818) |
| Decision Date | 01 February 1818 |
| Parties | HOUSTON v. MOORE |
Mr. C. J. Ingersoll moved to dismiss the writ of error, as having been improvidently issued under the 25th section of the judiciary act, ch. 20. the decision of the state court not being a 'final judgment' in the cause.
Mr. Hopkins, contra.
Mr. Ch. J. MARSHALL delivered the opinion of the court.
The appellate jurisdiction of this court, under the 25th se...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
13 cases
-
West Virginia Motor Truck Ass'n v. PUBLIC SERVICE COM'N
...413, 418, 419, 35 S.Ct. 625, 59 L.Ed. 1027; Haseltine v. Central National Bank, 183 U.S. 130, 22 S.Ct. 49, 46 L.Ed. 117; Houston v. Moore, 3 Wheat. 433, 4 L.Ed. 428. Applying this test to the case before us, we think the decision of the West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals was not a final......
-
Union Mut Life Ins Co v. Kirchoff
...when the opinion to which the new decree is required to conform does not appear. Brown v. Baxter, 146 U. S. 619, 13 Sup. Ct. 260; Houston v. Moore, 3 Wheat. 433; Bostwick v. Brinkerhoff, 106 U. S. 3, 1 Sup. Ct. 15; Johnson v. Keith, 117 U. S. 199, 6 Sup. Ct. 669; Rice v. Sanger, 144 U. S. 1......
-
Muskogee Land Co. v. Blackburn
...v. Belt et al., 56 F. 328, 5 C. C. A. 521; Life Ins. Co. v. Scheffer, 105 U.S. 703, 26 L.Ed. 1110; Houston v. Moore, 3 Wheat. (U. S.) 433, 4 L.Ed. 428; Smith v. Adams, 130 U.S. 168, 9 566, 32 L.Ed. 895; 1 Freeman on Judgments (4th Ed.) § 32-c; 1 Black on Judgments, § 31. In the case of Stat......
-
Tilford v. Ramsey
...is not a final judgment. Final judgments are such as at once put an end to the action. (3 Blackst. Com. 398; 1 Kent, 316; 24 Pick. 300; 3 Wheat. 433; 6 How. 201, 209; 5 N. Y. 571; 4 N. Y. 415; 4 How. Pr. 78; 6 id. 280; 15 id. 57; 7 Mo. 348.) The Circuit Court in general term is not a separa......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Structuralism and the War Powers: the Army, Navy and Militia Clauses
...invasion on a grand scale was precluded by America's distance from Europe." Kohn, supra note 14, at 85. [122]. See Houston v. Moore, 16 U.S. 433 (1820). [123]. The Federalist No. 26 (Alexander Hamilton); see also The Federalist Nos. 28, 51 (Alexander Hamilton). [124]. Blackstone had written......