HOWARD V. ADAMS

Docket NumberNo. CA 08-1190
Decision Date30 September 2009

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex

Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant

  • Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database

  • Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength

  • Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities

  • Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

vLex
8 cases
  • Howard v. Lauren Adams & Brady & Jackson, P. L.L.C.
    • United States
    • Arkansas Court of Appeals
    • October 10, 2012
    ...Watkins, who had previously represented Howard and his father. Following our reversal of a summary judgment in Howard v. Adams, 2009 Ark.App. 621, 332 S.W.3d 24( Howard I ), the case went to trial, and the jury found that, although Watkins had committed deceit and breached his fiduciary dut......
  • Combined Healthcare Fed. Credit Union v. Arands Corp.
    • United States
    • Arkansas Court of Appeals
    • April 13, 2011
    ...Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 371 Ark. 508, 268 S.W.3d 298 (2007); Acuff v. Bumgarner, 2009 Ark. App. 854, 371 S.W.3d 709;Howard v. Adams, 2009 Ark. App. 621, 332 S.W.3d 24; Lynn v. Wal–Mart Stores, Inc., 102 Ark.App. 65, 280 S.W.3d 574 (2008). The majority does not explain why it is proper in ......
  • Young v. Blake, CV-19-761
    • United States
    • Arkansas Court of Appeals
    • October 5, 2022
    ...a case (the trust malpractice matter) within a case (the legal malpractice matter that is now before us). See Howard v. Adams , 2009 Ark. App. 621, 332 S.W.3d 24 ( Howard I ); Smith v. McLaughlin , 289 Va. 241, 769 S.E.2d 7 (2015) ; Dennis v. Northcutt , 923 So.2d 275 (Ala. 2005) ; 4 Ronald......
  • Acuff v. Bumgarner
    • United States
    • Arkansas Court of Appeals
    • December 16, 2009
    ...We view the facts in a light most favorable to Bethel, as the party resisting the motion for summary judgment. Howard v. Adams, 2009 Ark. App. 621, 332 S.W.3d 24. Frank and Mary Bumgarner had three children: Donald, Virgil, and the youngest, Bethel, who was born in 1927. In the 1950s and 19......
  • Get Started for Free