Howard v. Maggio, 75-4222
| Decision Date | 22 October 1976 |
| Docket Number | No. 75-4222,75-4222 |
| Citation | 540 F.2d 1280 |
| Parties | Paul Harry HOWARD, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ross MAGGIO, Jr., acting warden, Louisiana State Penitentiary, Respondent-Appellee. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fifth Circuit |
Patrick C. McGinity, New Orleans, La. (court appointed), for petitioner-appellant.
Ralph Roy, Asst. Dist. Atty., 19th Judicial Dist., Parish of Eastern Baton Rouge, Ossie B. Brown, Dist. Atty., William J. Guste, Jr., Atty. Gen., Baton Rouge, La., for respondent-appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Louisiana.
Before AINSWORTH and RONEY, Circuit Judges, and ALLGOOD, District Judge.
The district court, relying on the State Court record and without an evidentiary hearing denied Howard, a Louisiana state prisoner, habeas relief. We affirm.
Howard was sentenced to ninety nine years at hard labor after conviction by a jury for armed robbery. The Louisiana Supreme Court affirmed, State v. Howard, 262 La. 270, 263 So.2d 32. Howard argues four constitutional violations. (1) The prosecutor, in his summation, commented on Howard's failure to testify in his own defense. (2) His confession, which was admitted into evidence, was the product of coercion and duress. (3) The penalty provision of Louisiana Revised Statutes 14:64, under which Howard was sentenced, deprives him of equal protection of the laws and constitutes cruel and unusual punishment. (4) The state trial court erred in sentencing Howard without a presentence investigation.
Howard's contention that there was prejudicial prosecution argument is without merit. The trial judge found that when the prosecutor stated that " he hasn't seen fit to tell us why he shot Mrs. Stablier," the prosecutor was simply referring to a lengthy tape-recorded confession in which Howard admitted the crime but gave no explanation for shooting the victim of the robbery. This tape, which counsel pointed to during summation, was sitting on the rail of the jury box when the comment was made. The state record supports the trial judge's analysis of this incident.
With regard to the admission of a lengthy tape-recorded interrogation which contained inculpatory statements, Howard was adequately informed of his constitutional rights and signed a waiver form. We find without merit his contention that his silence and crying during the continued interrogation compelled a finding that he wished to terminate the investigation and did not wish to...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
State v. Patterson
...See, e.g., Katz v. King, 627 F.2d 568, 576 (1st Cir.1980) (failure to use PSI is not of constitutional dimensions); Howard v. Maggio, 540 F.2d 1280, 1282 (5th Cir.1976) (PSI is aid to counsel, not right of accused); Segura v. Patterson, 402 F.2d 249, 252 (10th Cir.1968), rev'd on other grou......
-
Blake v. Zant
...is entitled to no relief on this point. LaVallee v. Delle Rose, 410 U.S. 690, 93 S.Ct. 1203, 35 L.Ed.2d 637 (1972); Howard v. Maggio, 540 F.2d 1280, 1282 (5th Cir. 1976); Branch v. Estelle, 631 F.2d 1229, 1233 (5th Cir. Second petitioner contends that his confession should have been exclude......
-
Ortiz v. Duckworth
...F.2d 191 (7th Cir. 1972). The burden is on the petitioner to show that the state proceedings were not full and fair. See Howard v. Maggio, 540 F.2d 1280 (5th Cir. 1976), and Velleca v. Superintendent M.C.I., Walpole, 523 F.2d 1040 (1st Cir. 1975). If Jenkins represents the Supreme Court of ......
-
Terrebonne v. Blackburn
...sentence imposed after trial court reviewed a presentence report and sentence was within the 10-year per count maximum); Howard v. Maggio, 540 F.2d 1280 (5th Cir. 1976) (upholding 99-year sentence for armed robbery without benefit of parole, probation, or suspension of sentence; sentence wa......
-
Administrative hearings
...See Sawyers v. State , 724 S.W.2d 24 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986); Taylor v. Riddle , 563 F.2d 133 (4th Cir. 1977); and Howard v. Maggio , 540 F.2d 1280 (5th Cir. 1976). In these cases, courts have held that a defendant must make “some sort of affirmative assertion of [his/her] desire to exercise......