Howell v. Bd. Of Com'rs For City Of Quitman, (No. 6795.)

Decision Date19 September 1929
Docket Number(No. 6795.)
Citation169 Ga. 74,149 S.E. 779
PartiesHOWELL et al. v. BOARD OF COM'RS FOR CITY OF QUITMAN.
CourtGeorgia Supreme Court

(Syllabus by Editorial Staff.)

Russell, C. J., dissenting.

Error from Superior Court, Brooks County; W. E. Thomas, Judge.

Mandamus by W. C. Howell and others against the Board of Commissioners for the City of Quitman. Judgment for defendant, and applicant brings error. Reversed.

L. W. Branch, of Quitman, and E. K. Wilcox and T. G. Connell, both of Valdosta, for plaintiff in error.

Russell Snow, of Quitman, for defendant in error.

Syllabus Opinion by the Court.

ATKINSON, J. The city of Quitman has a population of about 5, 000. Screven street extends east and west entirely through the city. It is intersected by Clay and Madison streets, which extend north and south through the city. It is also intersected by five other streets, parallel with and located between Clay and Madison streets. One of these is Washington street, which is the way of immediate approach to the Atlantic Coast Line Railroad station. This is a paved street, and at the point of intersection with Screven street it is 66 feet wide, including two sidewalks. The driveway in the street is 27 feet wide. Screven street is 132 feet wide, having two paved driveways and sidewalks, with a curbed park in the center. The driveways on Screven street, between Washington and Madison streets are each 33 feet wide, and the sidewalks each 16 feet wide. The driveways on Screven street between Washington and Clay streets are each 27 feet wide, and the sidewalks 21 feet wide. Screven street is the principal residential and business street in the city. Next in importance are Washington and South Lee streets. The vehicular and pedestrian travel on Washington street is about equal to that on Screven street at the point of intersection. The intersection of Screven and Washington streets is at the heart of the business section of the city, and at this point approximately 1, 000 pedestrians and 1, 500 vehicles pass on Screven street each day in the year. With the situation as indicated, the board of commissioners of the city adopted an ordinance declaring:

"That from and after the passage of this ordinance it shall be unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to erect any filling station or service station for the purpose of selling, or giving away, or otherwise disposing of gasoline, oil, or greases to be delivered to or placed in automobiles, trucks, or other motor vehicles, in which such motor vehicles shall be or may be driven across the sidewalks of the city on Screven street between Clay street and Madison street. That it shall be unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to drive any automobile, truck, or other motor vehicle across the sidewalks of the city on Screven street between Clay street and Madison street for the purpose of receiving from a filling station gasoline, oils, or greases. That it shall be unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to erect any filling station or service station for the purpose of selling or giving away or otherwise disposing of. gasoline, oil, or motor vehicles, or any garage or other building in which such motor vehicles shall or may be driven across the sidewalks of the city, except by special permission of the board of commissioners. That all persons, firms, or corporations violating any of the provisions of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and shall be punished as provided in section 217 of the Code of the City. That any filling station or service station erected in violation of this ordinance shall be deemed a public nuisance and abatable as such."

After adoption of this ordinance, W. C. Howell and Fuller Pedrick, being lessees of described realty for a term exceeding five years, made formal application to the board of commissioners for special permission to construct and equip a filling and service station at the southeast corner of Screven and Washington streets, for "selling and otherwise disposing of gasoline, oil, greases, and tires, " and for "permission to so change the sidewalks on Screven and Washington streets as to facilitate the passage of motor vehicles through said filling station from Screven street to Washington street, and vice versa." The space to be occupied by the proposed filling station was a part of an existing building, and had a frontage of 261/4 feet on Screven street and 55 feet on Washington street....

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Continental Oil Co. v. City of Twin Falls
    • United States
    • Idaho Supreme Court
    • March 22, 1930
    ... ... , the Chief of Police, All of Said City, Appellants No. 5268 Supreme Court of Idaho March 22, 1930 ... 557, 207 P. 720; State ex rel. Warson v. Howell, 92 Wash ... 540, 159 P. 777.) ... [49 ... ...
  • City of San Antonio v. Pigeonhole Parking of Texas
    • United States
    • Texas Supreme Court
    • February 26, 1958
    ...by respondent notably Anzalone v. Metropolitan District Commission, 257 Mass. 32, 153 N.E. 325, 17 A.L.R. 897; Howell v. Board of Commissioners, 169 Ga. 74, 149 S.E. 779; Brownlow v. O'Donoghue Bros., Inc., 51 App.D.C. 114, 276 F. 636, 22 A.L.R. 939, and Newman v. Mayor of City of Newport, ......
  • Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority v. Datry
    • United States
    • Georgia Supreme Court
    • October 28, 1975
    ...v. Hornsby, 213 Ga. 114, 116, 97 S.E.2d 300 (1957); Barham v. Grant, 185 Ga. 601, 604(5), 196 S.E. 43 (1938); Howell v. Bd. of Commrs., 169 Ga. 74(4), 149 S.E. 779 (1929); State Hwy. Bd. v. Baxter, 167 Ga. 124(2), 144 S.E. 796 (1928). The easement consists of the right of egress from and in......
  • Cheek v. Floyd County, Georgia, Civ. A. No. 1921.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Northern District of Georgia
    • January 29, 1970
    ...a substantial change in access to authorize any claim. State Highway Board v. Baxter, 167 Ga. 124, 144 S.E. 796 (1928); Howell v. Quitman, 169 Ga. 74, 149 S.E. 779 (1929); Horten v. City of Atlanta, 116 Ga.App. 350, 157 S.E.2d 501 (1967). Mere "circuity of travel" is not actionable. Hadwin ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT