Howell v. Foster

Decision Date27 September 1887
Citation122 Ill. 276,13 N.E. 527
PartiesHOWELL v. FOSTER.
CourtIllinois Supreme Court

OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE

Error to appellate court, Third district.

H. Pasco and B. I. Sterrett, for plaintiff in error.

Outten & Vail, for defendant in error.

MULKEY, J.

The present writ of error brings before us for review a judgment of the appellate court for the Third district, affirming an order and decree of the circuit court of Macon county, dismissing a bill in equity filed therein by Ezekiel Howell against William Foster, the sheriff of the county to restrain him from selling certain real estate belonging to the former, under numerous fee-bills and executions then in his hands in favor of various parties, and for divers small sums of money, amounting in the aggregate to over $500. The bill charges ‘that on the twenty-fifth of February, March the 3d and March 9th, 1886, one Fredrick Aholtz, deceased, by warranty and quitclaim, and for a valuable consideration by your orator to him paid, deeded and conveyed to your orator all and each and every part and parcel of the property hereafter mentioned and described, then owned and claimed by the said Aholtz, situated in Macon county, Illinois; that said deeds of conveyance are on record in said county of Macon; that prior to the time of making such conveyances by said Aholtz to your orator, to-wit, at the times hereinafter by the proceedings shown, divers judgments for costs were rendered against the said Aholtz in the circuit court of Macon county. All of the said judgments, or nearly all of them, were over seven years old at the time said conveyances were made by the said Aholtz to your orator, and said judgments, or nearly all of them, were over seven years old at the time the divers executions or fee-bills were issued on the same as herein complained of,-all of which judgments, executions, or fee-bills, and the levies by the sheriff made thereby, together with the different pieces of property thereon levied, are hereinafter fully described and set forth; that by reason of the lapse of time, to-wit, more than seven years, the said judgments had all or nearly all become stale, and ceased to be liens on said real estate, or any part thereof, by reason of limitation as aforesaid prior to the time such fee-bills or executions were issued and said conveyances made by Aholtz to your orator; that on or about December 24, 1885, about 18 fee-bills or executions were issued and placed in the hands of the sheriff of Macon county...

To continue reading

Request your trial
5 cases
  • Howard v. Luke
    • United States
    • Arizona Supreme Court
    • April 18, 1917
    ... ... quoted: Spear v. Campbell, 4 Scam. (Ill.) ... 424; Farmers Nat. Bank v. Sperling, 113 ... Ill. 273; Howell v. Foster, 122 Ill. 276, ... 13 N.E. 527; Gerard v. Bates, 124 Ill. 150, ... 7 Am. St. Rep. 350, 16 N.E. 258; Johnson v ... Huber, 134 Ill. 511, ... ...
  • Conway v. Sexton
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • December 22, 1909
    ...rule laid down in the decision just quoted: Spear v. Campbell, 4 Scam. 424;Farmers' Nat. Bank v. Sperling, 113 Ill. 273;Howell v. Foster, 122 Ill. 276, 13 N. E. 527;Gerard v. Bates, 124 Ill. 150, 16 N. E. 258,7 Am. St. Rep. 350;Johnson v. Huber, 134 Ill. 511, 25 N. E. 790;Bradley v. Gilbert......
  • Rodisch v. Moore
    • United States
    • Illinois Supreme Court
    • February 23, 1912
    ...if it should be held valid. All persons whose interest will be directly affected by the decree should be made parties. Howell v. Foster, 122 Ill. 276, 13 N. E. 527. ‘It is a well-established rule in equity that all persons are to be made parties who have any legal or equitable interest in t......
  • Cheney v. Bengtson
    • United States
    • Minnesota Supreme Court
    • March 1, 1935
    ...party defendant. Mast v. Baker, Sheriff, 69 Fla. 585, 68 So. 769; Gober v. Richards, 160 Ga. 565, 128 S.E. 668; Howell v. Foster, 122 Ill. 276, 13 N.E. 527; Nail v. Taylor (Tex.Civ.App.) 223 S.W. Arnold v. Pope, Sheriff, 37 Utah, 204, 108 P. 351. It is said the judgment creditor has the rig......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT