Hu v. Holder Jr.
| Docket Number | 09-70240 |
| Decision Date | 14 July 2011 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
68 cases
-
Angov v. Lynch
...; Haile v. Holder, 658 F.3d 1122, 1124–25 (9th Cir.2011) ; Singh v. Holder, 656 F.3d 1047, 1049–50 (9th Cir.2011) ; Hu v. Holder, 652 F.3d 1011, 1013–15 (9th Cir.2011) ; Kumar v. Gonzales, 444 F.3d 1043, 1047–48 (9th Cir.2006).Take, as a small example, the letter from Daniela Mihaylova that......
-
Angov v. Holder
...Haile v. Holder, 658 F.3d 1122, 1124–25 (9th Cir.2011); Singh v. Holder, 656 F.3d 1047, 1049–50 (9th Cir.2011); Hu v. Holder, 652 F.3d 1011, 1013–15 (9th Cir.2011); Kumar v. Gonzales, 444 F.3d 1043, 1047–48 (9th Cir.2006). Take, as a small example, the letter from Daniela Mihaylova that Ang......
-
Ming Dai v. Sessions
...petitioner is deemed credible. To the contrary, in a post-REAL ID opinion we stated and applied that rule. See Zhiqiang Hu v. Holder , 652 F.3d 1011, 1013 n.1 (9th Cir. 2011) ; see also Kazemzadeh v. U.S. Attorney Gen. , 577 F.3d 1341, 1354 (11th Cir. 2009) (W. Pryor, J.) (post-REAL ID appl......
-
Garland v. Dai
...[the alien's] factual contentions are true" or at least credible. E.g. , Kataria v. INS , 232 F.3d 1107, 1114 (2000) ; Zhiqiang Hu v. Holder , 652 F.3d 1011 (2011) ; 884 F.3d at 868 ; 727 Fed.Appx. at 261. This view appears to be an outlier. The First Circuit, for example, has held that a r......
Request a trial to view additional results