Hubbard City v. Bounds
| Decision Date | 26 May 1906 |
| Citation | Hubbard City v. Bounds, 95 S.W. 69 (Tex. App. 1906) |
| Parties | HUBBARD CITY v. BOUNDS et al. |
| Court | Texas Court of Appeals |
Appeal from District Court, Hill County; W. C. Wear, Judge.
Action by Hubbard City against W. R. Bounds and another. From a judgment in favor of defendants, plaintiff appeals. Reversed and remanded.
Henry Bishop, F. P. Works, and R. M. Vaughan, for appellant. E. W. Bounds, for appellees.
Appellant instituted this suit for the purpose of compelling specific performance of a contract entered into between it and the Hubbard City Waterworks Company for the construction and operation of a waterworks system in said city, and to prevent by injunction a violation of said contract. That portion of the contract sought to be enforced and certain provisions relating thereto read thus:
The specifications drawn by the waterworks company for the construction of the waterworks plant under the contract, which were introduced in evidence, provided that: etc.
Appellant, among other things, alleged that said system of waterworks provided for in said contract was finished on or about the ____ day of August, A. D. 1900, according to the terms and provisions of said contract; that is to say, said system being furnished and equipped with one standard duplex pump of ample daily capacity, namely, daily capacity of 500,000 gallons, or about 21,000 gallons per hour; one boiler of ample power to operate said pump; one 40 horse power engine, pump and boiler house; one standpipe 12 feet in diameter by 100 feet high; 10 double nozzle standard fire hydrants; 1,000 feet of standard cast iron pipe, size 6 inches, with all valves, fittings, and appliances necessary to make the system complete in every respect. That for the purpose of complying with the terms and requirements of said contract to be performed by the said Hubbard City Waterworks Company, the standard duplex pump of 500,000 gallons daily capacity and one 40 horse power engine and boiler was originally installed as a part of the system of said waterworks, and was maintained and kept in use from the date same was installed until on or about the ____ day of July, A. D. 1904. That said pump, engine, and boiler were of ample daily capacity to furnish, and did furnish, a sufficient supply of water for domestic use, fire protection, and pressure sufficient for the purpose of fire protection. That on or about the ____ day of June, 1903, the defendant W. R. Bounds acquired and became the owner of all the capital stock of the said Hubbard City Waterworks Company, and that said Bounds continued said equipments, and maintained said waterworks system as it had theretofore been maintained, using said engine, boiler, and pump up to about the ____ day of July, A. D. 1904. That the defendants, W. R. Bounds and Hubbard City Waterworks Company, did, on or about the ____ day of July, 1904, and without the consent of plaintiff, disconnect from said waterworks system, and discontinue the use in connection therewith, said duplex pump, 40 horse power engine and boiler, and instead thereof substituted a small pump of not exceeding in capacity about 8,000 gallons per hour, and one 10 horse power gasoline engine to operate said pump. That said system as now equipped with...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
-
Black v. The North Dakota State Fair Association for Grand Forks
... ... Winona ... Mill Co., 49 Minn. 1, 51 N.W. 619; Minnesota Mfg ... Co. v. Grant City Lumber & Hardware Co., 81 Mo.App. 255; ... Casners' Estate Mills v. Stafford, 86 Ill.App ... as controlling by the courts. Such conduct is the best ... evidence of its meaning. Hubbard City v. Bounds, Tex ... Civ. App. , 95 S.W. 69; 2 Page, Contr. § 1126; ... Geithman v ... ...
-
Snip v. City of Lamar
... ... Terminal Ry., 324 Mo. 882, 25 S.W.2d 1055; Flege v ... Covington, etc., Co., 122 Ky. 348, 91 S.W. 738, 121 Am ... St. Rep. 463; Hubbard City v. Bounds, (Tex. Civ ... App.), 95 S.W. 69; Edison Illuminating Co. v ... Eastern Penn. Power Co., 253 Pa. 457, 98 A. 652; Joy ... v ... ...
-
Bounds v. Hubbard City
...appeal was from a judgment in favor of the present appellants, which judgment was by this court reversed and remanded. Hubbard City v. Bounds (Tex. Civ. App.) 95 S. W. 69. The suit is one instituted by the appellee, Hubbard City, to compel specific performance of a contract entered into bet......