Hubbard v. Mississippi Conf. of the United Methodist, Civil Action No. 3:00CV336BN.
| Citation | 138 F.Supp.2d 780 |
| Decision Date | 25 April 2001 |
| Docket Number | Civil Action No. 3:00CV336BN. |
| Parties | Russelle L. HUBBARD, Plaintiff v. The MISSISSIPPI CONFERENCE OF THE UNITED METHODIST CHURCH; Christ United Methodist Church; Marty Parks; Laura K. Rogers (a/k/a Laura K. Humphreys); Kevin L. Humphreys; James O. Nelson, II; Fictitious Parties A, B, C, D, E, F, Defendants |
| Court | U.S. District Court — Southern District of Mississippi |
Russelle L. Hubbard, Alabaster, AL, pro se.
Michael A. Heilman, OTT & Purdy, P.A., Jackson, MS, Mark H. Tyson, Virginia M. Todd, McGlinchey Stafford, Jackson, MS, John Robert White, Jr., Jackson, MS, Thomas Y. Page, Page, Kruger & Holland, P.A., Jackson, MS, William Matthew Vines, Page, Kruger, & Holland, P.A., Ridgeland, MS, for defendants.
The purpose of this Order is to make two corrections to the Opinion and Order of this Court entered by the Clerk of Court on April 19, 2001. Neither correction in any way affects this Court's grant of summary judgment in favor of all Defendants on all claims of Plaintiff Russelle Hubbard ("Hubbard").
In regard to the claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress of Hubbard this Court stated that the statute of limitations applicable to such a claim is the one year statute of limitations found at section 15-1-35 of the Mississippi Code. The Court based this determination on the holding of the Mississippi Court of Appeals in Air Comfort Sys. v. Honeywell, Inc., 760 So.2d 43, 47 (Miss.Ct.App.2000), in which the court explicitly held that the statute of limitations for intentional infliction of emotional distress is one year. The Mississippi Court of Appeals based this pronouncement on the decision of the Mississippi Supreme Court in Nichols v. Tri-State Brick & Tile Co., Inc., 608 So.2d 324 (Miss. 1992).
However, while researching another matter, a 1996 decision of the Mississippi Supreme Court was brought to the attention of the Court. In Norman v. Bucklew, 684 So.2d 1246, 1256 (Miss.1996), the Mississippi Supreme Court expressly stated that the statute of limitations applicable to intentional infliction of emotional distress is three years pursuant to the Mississippi general statute of limitations found at section 15-1-49 of the Mississippi Code. Accordingly, the Court is faced with a conflict in holdings between the Mississippi Supreme Court and the Mississippi Court of Appeals.
Even though the Mississippi Court of Appeals decision is more recent, the Court must follow the holding of the highest Mississippi court, the Mississippi Supreme Court.1 Accordingly, the applicable statute of limitations for Hubbard's intentional infliction of emotional distress claim is three years. Nevertheless, even in reviewing the conduct of Defendants for the three years prior to Hubbard's filing of his Complaint, the conduct of Defendants in no way rises to the level of that required to support a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress as required by the standard set forth in this Court's previous Opinion and Order. After applying the proper three year statute of limitations, the Court reaffirms its ruling that Defendants are entitled to summary judgment on Hubbard's intentional infliction of emotional distress claim.
The Court next corrects its holding that in Mississippi, the applicable statute of limitations for causes of action arising pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 is one year. Under the holdings of Gates v. Spinks, 771 F.2d 916, 920 (5th Cir.1985) and Hanner v. State of Mississippi, 833 F.2d 55, 56 (5th Cir.1987), this used to be the case. In those decisions, the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit followed the mandate of Wilson v. Garcia, 471 U.S. 261, 105 S.Ct. 1938, 85 L.Ed.2d 254 (1985) that federal courts sitting in a particular state must choose a statute of limitations of that state to govern section 1983 actions. The statute to be selected was that which...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Worley Brown, LLC v. Mississippi Dep't of Archives & History
...three-year statute of limitations found in Mississippi Code § 15-1-49.12 Hubbard v. Miss. Conf. of the United Methodist Church, 138 F. Supp. 2d 780, 781 (S.D. Miss. 2001). Federal law determines when a cause of action accrues13 for purposes of § 1983 claims. Osborne, 133 F.3d at 319. "Under......
-
Jones v. FLUOR DANIEL SERVICES CORP.
...nonbinding federal interpretation. Even so, there are federal cases going both ways. See, e.g. Hubbard v. Miss. Conference of United Methodist Church, 138 F.Supp.2d 780 (S.D.Miss.2001), dismissed, 31 Fed.Appx. 153 (5th ¶ 46. The confusion as to whether Section 15-1-35 applies to claims of i......
-
Jones v. Fluor Daniel Services Corporation, No. 2008-CA-00456-SCT (Miss. 2/18/2010)
...nonbinding federal interpretation. Even so, there are federal cases going both ways. See, e.g. Hubbard v. Miss. Conference of United Methodist Church, 138 F. Supp. 2d 780 (S.D. Miss. 2001), dismissed, 31 Fed. Appx. 153 (5th Cir. ¶ 45. The confusion as to whether Section 15-1-35 applies to c......
-
Hervey v. Metlife General Ins. Corp., Miss.
...conclusion recently reached by Judge William H. Barbour on the question presented, see Hubbard v. Mississippi Conference of United Methodist Church, 138 F.Supp.2d 780, 780-81 (S.D.Miss. April 25, 2001) (concluding that "the applicable statute of limitations for [an] intentional infliction o......