Hucul v. Navy Federal Credit Union, 061819 FED9, 18-55177

Docket Nº:18-55177
Party Name:MICHAEL HUCUL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Defendant-Appellee.
Judge Panel:Before: CANBY, GRABER, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.
Case Date:June 18, 2019
Court:United States Courts of Appeals, Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
 
FREE EXCERPT

MICHAEL HUCUL, Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

NAVY FEDERAL CREDIT UNION, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 18-55177

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

June 18, 2019

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

Submitted June 11, 2019 [**]

Appeal from the United States District Court D.C. No. 3:17-cv-02238-DMS-MDD for the Southern District of California Dana M. Sabraw, District Judge, Presiding

Before: CANBY, GRABER, and MURGUIA, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM [*]

Michael Hucul appeals pro se from the district court's judgment dismissing his action alleging that defendant violated the Right to Financial Privacy Act ("RFPA") by disclosing his financial information to a state agency. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a district court's dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim. Cervantes v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc., 656 F.3d 1034, 1040 (9th Cir. 2011). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Hucul's action because section 3403(a) of the RFPA governs financial disclosures only to the federal government and its employees. See 12 U.S.C. § 3403(a) (prohibiting financial institutions from releasing financial records to any...

To continue reading

FREE SIGN UP