Hudson Smith v. Guestier
| Decision Date | 03 February 1812 |
| Parties | HUDSON & SMITH v. GUESTIER |
| Court | U.S. Supreme Court |
BY THE COURT, that the case could not be re-heard after the term in which it had been decided.
GENERAL RULE.
February 10th.
Winder, requested information from the Court whether the general rule which directs that only two counsellors should be heard on each side of any cause in this Court, was intended to prevent the division of a cause into distinct points, and the hearing of two counsellors on each point.
The chief justice being absent) informed the bar that the Court considered the rule as inflexible, whatever may be the number of points or parties in a cause.
* The Chief Justice did not attend until Thursday, February 13. He received an injury by the over-setting of the stage coach on his journey from Richmond.
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Gilmore v. United States
...the expiration of the term at which it was entered, unless the proceeding for that purpose was begun during that term. Hudson v. Guestier, 7 Cranch 1, 3 L.Ed. 249; Cameron v. McRoberts, 3 Wheat. 591, 4 L.Ed. 467; Ex parte Sibbald, 12 Pet. 488, 492, 9 L.Ed. 1167, 1169; Bank of United States ......
-
Glass Co v. Co
...in accordance with all earlier precedents that, even in a case of such hardship, the District Court had no such power. 6 Hudson v. Guestier, 7 Cranch 1, 3 L.Ed. 249; Jackson v. Ashton, 10 Pet. 480, 9 L.Ed. 502; Sibbald v. United States, supra, 12 Pet. at page 492, 9 L.Ed. 1167; Washington B......
-
Gratiot v. The Missouri Pacific Railway Company
... ... 194; Tetherow v. Railroad, 98 ... Mo. 74; Kelly v. Railroad, 70 Mo. 604; Smith v ... Railroad, 61 Mo. 588; Meyer v Railroad, 40 Mo ... 151; Wilkins v. Railroad, 101 Mo ... first made at a term subsequent to final judgment, cannot ... properly be considered. Hudson v. Guestier (1812), 7 ... Cranch 1, 3 L.Ed. 249; Brooks v. Railroad (1880) 102 ... U.S. 107, ... ...
-
United States v. Bruce
...the expiration of the term at which it was entered, unless the proceeding for that purpose was begun during that term. Hudson v. Guester, 7 Cranch 1, 3 L.Ed. 249; Cameron v. McRoberts, 3 Wheat. 591, 4 L.Ed. 467; Ex parte Sibbald, 12 Pet. 488, 492, 9 L.Ed. 1167, 1169; Bank of United States v......
-
Shipwrecked Sovereignty
...Bank of New York v. Republic of China, 348 U.S. 356, 362 (1955). Cited in Odyssey (11th Ct.), 1140.18. The Schooner Exchange v. McFaddon, 11 U.S. 116, 137 (1812); Republic of the Philippines v. Pimentel, 553 U.S. 851, 128 (2008).19. Republic of the Philippines v. Pimentel, 867. See also: Er......