Huesing v. City of Rock Island
Decision Date | 16 May 1889 |
Citation | 21 N.E. 558,128 Ill. 465 |
Parties | HUESING v. CITY OF ROCK ISLAND et al. |
Court | Illinois Supreme Court |
OPINION TEXT STARTS HERE
Appeal from appellate court, Second district.
Bill for injunction, brought by August Huesing against the city of Rock Island, Thomas Murdock, Robert Koehler, and George E. Lambert in the circuit court of Rock Island county.
Ira O. Wilkinson, Wm. Jackson, and Charles Dunham, for appellant.
Wm. McEniry and E. D. Sweeney, for appellees.
This was a bill in equity, brought by August Huesing, a resident and tax-payer of the city of Rock Island, to enjoin the municipal authorities of the city of Rock Island from maintainingan abattoir, or public slaughter-house, and appropriating the moneys of the city for that purpose. On the hearing in the circuit court a decree was rendered in favor of the complainant in the bill, but on appeal to the appellate court the decree was reversed, with directions to the circuit court to dismiss the bill. To reverse the judgment of the appellate court the complainant appealed to this court. The city of Rock Island contains a population of about 12,000 people, and is organized under the general incorporation law of the state. The city council procured by gift two acres of land in the city, and erected thereon a building where animals might be slaughtered for consumption in the city. On the 7th day of December, 1885, an ordinance was passed. The first section provides that the premises containing the two acres are designated and established as the city abattoir. Sections 2-10 of the ordinance are as follows:
Several questions of a technical character have been raised and discussed in the argument, but in the view we take of the record there is but one question of any importance presented, and that is whether the city council of Rock Island, under its charter, had the power to pass the ordinance establishing the city abattoir, and appropriate the revenues of the city for its erection and maintenance,-and this is the only question which it will be necessary to consider. Under chapter 24, art. 5, of our Revised Statues of 1874, 96 separate and distinct powers have been conferred on the city council in cities, and upon the president and board of trustees in villages. The powers relate to the various wants and necessities which the legislature no doubt supposed should be conferred upon such incorporations to enable them to preserve order, prevent violations of law, make due and proper regulations to secure the health of the inhabitants, and such other things as pertain to the property and welfare of such incorporated bodies. It will be observed, however, that of the powers enumerated none in terms authorize the construction or maintenance of an abattoir or public slaughter-house by the legislative department of the incorporation, and we find no such express power conferred by any provision of the statute. The city of Rock Island derives its powers, whatever they may be, from the act of the legislature providing for the incorporation of cities and villages, under which it is organized. In Cook Co. v. McCrea, 93 Ill. 236, following the rule laid down by Dillon in his work on Municipal Incorporations, it was held that a municipal corporation can exercise the following powers: First, those granted in express words; second, those necessarily or fairly implied in, or incident to, the powers expressly granted; third, those essential to the declared objects and purposes of the corporation, not simply convenient, but indispensable. There being no provision of the general incorporation law expressly conferring on the city the power to build or maintain an abattoir, if the power exists it must be implied in, or incident to, some of the powers expressly granted by the statute; and it may be conceded that, if the implied power exists, it springs from some one of the specific health powers granted by the act of incorporation. Those powers are as follows: etc. ‘(15) To regulate and prevent the depositing of ashes, offal, dirt, garbage, or any offensive matter in any street, alley,’ etc. ‘(40) To provide for the cleansing and purification of waters, water-courses,’ etc. ‘(53) To provide and regulate the inspection of meats, poultry, fish, butter, lard, cheese, vegetables, cotton, tobacco, flour, meal, and other provisions.’ ‘(57) To regulate the construction, repairs, and use of vaults, cisterns, areas, hydrants,...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Speas v. Kansas City
... ... Cleveland, 167 Mo. 388; St. Louis v ... Dreisoerner, 243 Mo. 223; Huesing v. City of Rock ... Island, 128 Ill. 465; Fallbrook Irrigation District ... v. Maria King ... ...
-
Speas v. Kansas City
... ... 8; City of Independence v. Cleveland, 167 Mo. 388; St. Louis v. Dreisoerner, 243 Mo. 223; Huesing v. City of Rock Island, 128 Ill. 465; Fallbrook Irrigation District v. Maria King Bradley, 164 U.S ... ...
- Dean Milk Co. v. City of Chicago
- City of Springfield v. Postal Tel.-Cable Co.