Huggins v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.
| Decision Date | 19 February 1980 |
| Docket Number | No. 35609,35609 |
| Citation | 245 Ga. 248,264 S.E.2d 191 |
| Court | Georgia Supreme Court |
| Parties | HUGGINS v. AETNA CASUALTY & SURETY COMPANY et al. |
Peter M. Blackford, Austell, for appellant.
Darrell L. Love, Anthony L. Cochran, Atlanta, for appellees.
Jessie Huggins was permanently injured when his hand and arm were caught in the roller end of a paper board machine. He sued the defendant insurance companies for negligent inspection, which he claims proximately caused his injuries. The trial court granted summary judgment to the insurance companies and the Court of Appeals affirmed (Huggins v. Aetna Cas., etc., Co., 151 Ga.App. 377, 259 S.E.2d 742 (1979)), holding that Huggins could not recover on his tort claim against the insurance companies because he had not relied on their inspections for his personal safety. We granted certiorari to resolve a conflict in the Court of Appeals' opinions and to decide whether reliance by the employee himself is required or whether reliance by the employer on the insurance companies' inspections is sufficient. We hold that reliance by either the employee or the employer on their inspections is sufficient to give rise to a cause of action in tort for negligent inspection by the insurance companies, and reverse the grant of summary judgment affirmed by the Court of Appeals.
Reliance as an element of this tort has been mentioned in many Court of Appeals decisions. Newton v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co., 148 Ga.App. 694, 252 S.E.2d 199 (1979); St. Paul Fire, etc., Ins. Co. v. Davidson, 148 Ga.App. 82, 251 S.E.2d 32 (1978), cert. den.; Redwing Carriers, Inc. v. Travelers Ins. Co., 147 Ga.App. 872, 250 S.E.2d 580 (1978); Winslett v. Twin City Fire Ins. Co., 141 Ga.App. 143, 232 S.E.2d 638 (1977); Pa. Millers Mut. Ins. Co. v. Thomas Milling Co., 137 Ga.App. 430, 224 S.E.2d 55 (1976), cert. den.; U. S. Fire Ins. Co. v. Day, 136 Ga.App. 359, 221 S.E.2d 467 (1975), cert. den.; Aetna Cas., etc., Co. v. C. P. Co., 134 Ga.App. 552, 215 S.E.2d 314 (1975); Sims v. American Cas. Co., 131 Ga.App. 461, 206 S.E.2d 121 (1974), affd. sub nom. Providence Washington Ins. Co. v. Sims, 232 Ga. 787, 209 S.E.2d 61 (1974). In Newton v. Liberty Mutual Ins. Co., supra, the Court of Appeals held, in reversing summary judgment for the insurance company, that reliance by the employer could satisfy this element of the tort. The case now before us is in conflict with this holding. Beam v. Omark Industries, Inc., 143 Ga.App. 142, 237 S.E.2d 607 (1977).
We here adopt the majority rule as stated in the Restatement 2d Torts § 324A: ...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Housing Authority of Atlanta v. Famble
...result is that the Georgia Supreme Court has adopted the majority rule contained in Restatement, Torts (2d) § 324A. Huggins v. Aetna Cas. & C. Co. 245 Ga. 248, 264 S.E.2d 191. This provision reads " 'Liability to Third Person for Negligent Performance of Undertaking. One who undertakes, gra......
-
Deines v. Vermeer Mfg. Co.
...(insurer who undertakes to inspect for insured's benefit owes duty to inspect with reasonable care); Huggens v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co., 245 Ga. 248, 248, 264 S.E.2d 191, 192 (1980) (reliance by employer on insurer's inspections gives rise to action in tort for negligent inspection). Th......
-
Grogan v. Uggla
...Inc. , 779 P.2d 315, 322 (Alaska 1989) ; Patton v. Simone , 626 A.2d 844, 849 (Del. Super. Ct. 1992) ; Huggins v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co. , 245 Ga. 248, 264 S.E.2d 191, 192 (1980) (describing Section 324A as the "majority rule" in negligent inspection cases); Thompson v. Bohlken , 312 N.W.2d ......
-
Ga. CVS Pharm. v. Carmichael
...negligent inspection claims. See Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v. Smith, 253 Ga. 588, 589-590 (III)-(IV) (322 S.E.2d 29) (1984); Huggins, 245 Ga. at 248; Davenport v. Cummins Alabama, Inc., 284 Ga.App. 672-673 (2) (644 S.E.2d 503) (2007); Finley v. Lehman, 218 Ga.App. 789, 790-791 (1) (46......
-
Torts - Deron R. Hicks and Travis C. Hargrove
...is suffered because of reliance of the other or the third person upon the undertaking." Id. (quoting Huggins v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 245 Ga. 248, 249, 264 S.E.2d 191, 192 (1980)). 104. Id. 105. 282 Ga. 771, 653 S.E.2d 699 (2007). 106. Id. at 774, 653 S.E.2d at 701. 107. Id. at 771, 653 S.......
-
Litigating Nursing Home Cases in Georgia
...Pye v. Taylor & Bird, Inc., 216 Ga. App. 814, 815, 456 S.E.2d 63, 65 (1995). 67. See Huggins v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co., 245 Ga. 248, 249, 264 S.E.2d 191, 192 (1980) (court adopted set forth in RESTATEMENT (SECOND) TORTS 324 in case involving employee's negligence claim against employer's ins......