Hughes v. City of Cedar Rapids, No. 14–CV–111–LRR.
Court | United States District Courts. 8th Circuit. Northern District of Iowa |
Writing for the Court | LINDA R. READE, Chief Judge. |
Citation | 112 F.Supp.3d 817 |
Decision Date | 02 July 2015 |
Docket Number | No. 14–CV–111–LRR. |
Parties | Gary HUGHES et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS, Iowa & Gatso USA, Inc., Defendants. |
112 F.Supp.3d 817
Gary HUGHES et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS, Iowa & Gatso USA, Inc., Defendants.
No. 14–CV–111–LRR.
United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Cedar Rapids Division.
Signed July 2, 2015.
James C. Larew, Larew Law Office, Iowa City, IA, Claire M. Diallo, Browne, Diallo & Roy, LLP, Princeton Junction, NJ, for Plaintiffs.
James H. Flitz, Cedar Rapids Attorney's Office, Paul David Burns, Laura Michelle Hyer, Bradley & Riley, Elizabeth D. Jacobi, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Defendants.
ORDER
LINDA R. READE, Chief Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS |
---|
I. | INTRODUCTION | 825 |
II. | PROCEDURAL HISTORY | 825 |
III. | SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION | 825 |
IV. | STANDARD OF REVIEW | 825 |
V. | FACTUAL BACKGROUND | 826 |
A. | Traffic Camera System | 826 |
B. | Plaintiffs | 827 |
1. | Gary Hughes | 827 |
2. | Arash Yarpezeshkan, Edward G. Robinson and James Louis Sparks | 827 |
3. | Krisanne M. Duhaime and Gerald Reid Duhaime | 828 |
4. | David Mazgaj | 828 |
5. | Susan M. Dumbaugh | 828 |
6. | Jerry Northrup | 828 |
7. | Daniel Ray French and Jeffrey V. Stimpson | 828 |
8. | Roger L. Lee | 828 |
VI. | ANALYSIS | 828 |
A. | Standing of Gary Hughes, David Mazgaj and Roger L. Lee | 828 |
1. | Parties' arguments | 828 |
2. | Applicable law | 829 |
3. | Application | 829 |
a. | Gary Hughes | 829 |
b. | David Mazgaj | 831 |
c. | Roger L. Lee | 832 |
B. | Procedural Due Process Claim Standing | 832 |
1. | Parties' arguments | 832 |
2. |
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Behm v. City of Cedar Rapids & Gatso United States, Inc., No. 16-1031
...equal protection, and privileges and immunities would be evaluated using a rational basis test. See Hughes v. City of Cedar Rapids, 112 F. Supp. 3d 817, 839 (N.D. Iowa 2015) (concluding that in order to show the fundamental right to travel has been infringed, the court looks to "[t]he direc......
-
Behm v. City of Cedar Rapids, No. 16-1031
...equal protection, and privileges and immunities would be evaluated using a rational basis test. See Hughes v. City of Cedar Rapids , 112 F.Supp.3d 817, 839 (N.D. Iowa 2015) (concluding that in order to show the fundamental right to travel has been infringed, the court looks to "[t]he direct......
-
Weizberg v. City of Des Moines, No. 17-1489
...are not unconstitutional simply because the ordinance does not spell out the additional options. See Hughes v. City of Cedar Rapids , 112 F.Supp.3d 817, 846–47 (N.D. Iowa 2015), aff’d in part, rev’d in part , 840 F.3d 987 (8th Cir. 2016). The City rejects the notion, adopted by the district......
-
Hughes v. City of Cedar Rapids, No. 15–2703
...labels and conclusions or tenders naked assertions devoid of further factual enhancement). See also Hughes v. City of Cedar Rapids , 112 F.Supp.3d 817, 847–48 (N.D. Iowa. 2015) (noting the two ways, plus appeals, to challenge an ATE citation).The drivers also allege that the process is inad......
-
Behm v. City of Cedar Rapids & Gatso United States, Inc., No. 16-1031
...equal protection, and privileges and immunities would be evaluated using a rational basis test. See Hughes v. City of Cedar Rapids, 112 F. Supp. 3d 817, 839 (N.D. Iowa 2015) (concluding that in order to show the fundamental right to travel has been infringed, the court looks to "[t]he direc......
-
Behm v. City of Cedar Rapids, No. 16-1031
...equal protection, and privileges and immunities would be evaluated using a rational basis test. See Hughes v. City of Cedar Rapids , 112 F.Supp.3d 817, 839 (N.D. Iowa 2015) (concluding that in order to show the fundamental right to travel has been infringed, the court looks to "[t]he direct......
-
Weizberg v. City of Des Moines, No. 17-1489
...are not unconstitutional simply because the ordinance does not spell out the additional options. See Hughes v. City of Cedar Rapids , 112 F.Supp.3d 817, 846–47 (N.D. Iowa 2015), aff’d in part, rev’d in part , 840 F.3d 987 (8th Cir. 2016). The City rejects the notion, adopted by the district......
-
Hughes v. City of Cedar Rapids, No. 15–2703
...labels and conclusions or tenders naked assertions devoid of further factual enhancement). See also Hughes v. City of Cedar Rapids , 112 F.Supp.3d 817, 847–48 (N.D. Iowa. 2015) (noting the two ways, plus appeals, to challenge an ATE citation).The drivers also allege that the process is inad......