Hughes v. City of Cedar Rapids, No. 14–CV–111–LRR.

CourtUnited States District Courts. 8th Circuit. Northern District of Iowa
Writing for the CourtLINDA R. READE, Chief Judge.
Citation112 F.Supp.3d 817
Decision Date02 July 2015
Docket NumberNo. 14–CV–111–LRR.
Parties Gary HUGHES et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS, Iowa & Gatso USA, Inc., Defendants.

112 F.Supp.3d 817

Gary HUGHES et al., Plaintiffs,
v.
CITY OF CEDAR RAPIDS, Iowa & Gatso USA, Inc., Defendants.

No. 14–CV–111–LRR.

United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Cedar Rapids Division.

Signed July 2, 2015.


112 F.Supp.3d 823

James C. Larew, Larew Law Office, Iowa City, IA, Claire M. Diallo, Browne, Diallo & Roy, LLP, Princeton Junction, NJ, for Plaintiffs.

James H. Flitz, Cedar Rapids Attorney's Office, Paul David Burns, Laura Michelle Hyer, Bradley & Riley, Elizabeth D. Jacobi, Cedar Rapids, IA, for Defendants.

ORDER

LINDA R. READE, Chief Judge.

TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION 825
II. PROCEDURAL HISTORY 825
III. SUBJECT MATTER JURISDICTION 825
IV. STANDARD OF REVIEW 825
V. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 826
A. Traffic Camera System 826
B. Plaintiffs 827
1. Gary Hughes 827
2. Arash Yarpezeshkan, Edward G. Robinson and James Louis Sparks 827
3. Krisanne M. Duhaime and Gerald Reid Duhaime 828
4. David Mazgaj 828
5. Susan M. Dumbaugh 828
6. Jerry Northrup 828
7. Daniel Ray French and Jeffrey V. Stimpson 828
8. Roger L. Lee 828
VI. ANALYSIS 828
A. Standing of Gary Hughes, David Mazgaj and Roger L. Lee 828
1. Parties' arguments 828
2. Applicable law 829
3. Application 829
a. Gary Hughes 829
b. David Mazgaj 831
c. Roger L. Lee 832
B. Procedural Due Process Claim Standing 832
1. Parties' arguments 832
2.
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 practice notes
  • Behm v. City of Cedar Rapids & Gatso United States, Inc., No. 16-1031
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Iowa
    • August 31, 2018
    ...equal protection, and privileges and immunities would be evaluated using a rational basis test. See Hughes v. City of Cedar Rapids, 112 F. Supp. 3d 817, 839 (N.D. Iowa 2015) (concluding that in order to show the fundamental right to travel has been infringed, the court looks to "[t]he direc......
  • Behm v. City of Cedar Rapids, No. 16-1031
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Iowa
    • January 25, 2019
    ...equal protection, and privileges and immunities would be evaluated using a rational basis test. See Hughes v. City of Cedar Rapids , 112 F.Supp.3d 817, 839 (N.D. Iowa 2015) (concluding that in order to show the fundamental right to travel has been infringed, the court looks to "[t]he direct......
  • Weizberg v. City of Des Moines, No. 17-1489
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Iowa
    • August 31, 2018
    ...are not unconstitutional simply because the ordinance does not spell out the additional options. See Hughes v. City of Cedar Rapids , 112 F.Supp.3d 817, 846–47 (N.D. Iowa 2015), aff’d in part, rev’d in part , 840 F.3d 987 (8th Cir. 2016). The City rejects the notion, adopted by the district......
  • Hughes v. City of Cedar Rapids, No. 15–2703
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
    • November 2, 2016
    ...labels and conclusions or tenders naked assertions devoid of further factual enhancement). See also Hughes v. City of Cedar Rapids , 112 F.Supp.3d 817, 847–48 (N.D. Iowa. 2015) (noting the two ways, plus appeals, to challenge an ATE citation).The drivers also allege that the process is inad......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
  • Behm v. City of Cedar Rapids & Gatso United States, Inc., No. 16-1031
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Iowa
    • August 31, 2018
    ...equal protection, and privileges and immunities would be evaluated using a rational basis test. See Hughes v. City of Cedar Rapids, 112 F. Supp. 3d 817, 839 (N.D. Iowa 2015) (concluding that in order to show the fundamental right to travel has been infringed, the court looks to "[t]he direc......
  • Behm v. City of Cedar Rapids, No. 16-1031
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Iowa
    • January 25, 2019
    ...equal protection, and privileges and immunities would be evaluated using a rational basis test. See Hughes v. City of Cedar Rapids , 112 F.Supp.3d 817, 839 (N.D. Iowa 2015) (concluding that in order to show the fundamental right to travel has been infringed, the court looks to "[t]he direct......
  • Weizberg v. City of Des Moines, No. 17-1489
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Iowa
    • August 31, 2018
    ...are not unconstitutional simply because the ordinance does not spell out the additional options. See Hughes v. City of Cedar Rapids , 112 F.Supp.3d 817, 846–47 (N.D. Iowa 2015), aff’d in part, rev’d in part , 840 F.3d 987 (8th Cir. 2016). The City rejects the notion, adopted by the district......
  • Hughes v. City of Cedar Rapids, No. 15–2703
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
    • November 2, 2016
    ...labels and conclusions or tenders naked assertions devoid of further factual enhancement). See also Hughes v. City of Cedar Rapids , 112 F.Supp.3d 817, 847–48 (N.D. Iowa. 2015) (noting the two ways, plus appeals, to challenge an ATE citation).The drivers also allege that the process is inad......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT