Hughes v. United States, 80-1812.
Decision Date | 21 May 1981 |
Docket Number | No. 80-1812.,80-1812. |
Citation | 662 F.2d 219 |
Parties | Jennifer Jill HUGHES and Stephanie Rachel Hughes, infants who sue by Gloria J. Hughes, their mother and next friend and Gloria J. Hughes, Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Appellee. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Fourth Circuit |
Thomas S. Shadrick, Norfolk, Va.(Pender, Coward, Addison & Morgan, Norfolk, Va., on brief), for appellants.
Marc Richman, Appellate Staff, Civ. Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C. (Thomas S. Martin, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., Washington, D. C., Justin W. Williams, U. S. Atty., Alexandria, Va., Anthony J. Steinmeyer, Appellate Staff, Civ. Div., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D. C., on brief), for appellee.
Before RUSSELL and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and ANDERSON,*District Judge.
These consolidated suits were brought by Gloria Hughes, as mother and next friend of infant sisters Jennifer and Stephanie Hughes, against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act, 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b),2671-2680.1Plaintiffs sought money damages for the alleged negligence of an employee of the United States Postal Service.The district court dismissed the suits, and we affirm.
In 1974, postal employee Dennis Sullivan was arrested and charged under state law with luring a twelve year old girl into his vehicle for the purpose of taking indecent sexual liberties with her.At the time of the incident, Sullivan was dressed in his uniform but was between mail routes.He pleaded guilty to a lesser charge and was ordered to submit to psychiatric treatment.Shortly after the sentencing, the girl's father met with postal supervisor J. T. Crosswhite and requested that Sullivan be relieved of his delivery duties.The request was denied, and Sullivan was allowed to resume his job as a carrier.
On July 3, 1979 and July 6, 1979, Sullivan, while on his route, lured Jennifer and Stephanie Hughes into his postal truck and took indecent sexual liberties with them.2These 1979 events form the bases of plaintiffs' claims that postal supervisor Crosswhite acted negligently in failing to relieve Sullivan of his delivery duties after the 1974 incident.
Certain exceptions, however, have been made to the government's exposure to liability under 28 U.S.C. § 1346(b), one of which prevents the government from being held liable on "any claim arising out of assault or battery."28 U.S.C....
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 3-day Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting

Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Doe Parents No. 1 v. State, Dept. of Educ.
...for the Fourth Circuit had held that the plaintiffs' claim was foreclosed by its precedents, specifically Hughes v. United States, 662 F.2d 219 (4th Cir.1981) (per curiam) (affirming district court's dismissal of plaintiffs' negligence claim because it arose out of postal employee's sexual ......
-
Shearer v. U.S.
...Gibson v. U.S., 457 F.2d at 1395-96. See also Hughes v. Sullivan, 514 F.Supp. 667, 669-70 (E.D.Va.1980), aff'd sub nom., Hughes v. U.S., 662 F.2d 219, 220 (4th Cir.1981); Naisbitt v. U.S., 611 F.2d 1350, 1354-55 (10th Cir.1980); U.S. v. Shively, 345 F.2d 294, 296-97 (5th In order to withsta......
-
Mulloy v. US
...Garcia v. United States, 776 F.2d 116 (5th Cir.1985); Thigpen v. United States, 800 F.2d 393, 395 (4th Cir. 1986); Hughes v. United States, 662 F.2d 219 (4th Cir.1981); Hoot v. United States, 790 F.2d 836 (10th Cir.1986); Johnson v. United States, 788 F.2d 845, 850-854 (2d Cir.1986). Other ......
-
Doe v. Durtschi
...assault or battery committed by a government employee. See, e.g., Doe v. United States, 769 F.2d 174 (4th Cir.1985); Hughes v. United States, 662 F.2d 219 (4th Cir.1981); Naisbitt v. United States, 611 F.2d 1350 (10th Cir.1980) cert. denied 449 U.S. 885, 101 S.Ct. 240, 66 L.Ed.2d 111. Altho......
-
RECOVERING THE TORT REMEDY FOR FEDERAL OFFICIAL WRONGDOING.
...v. United States, 344 F.3d 695, 697 (7th Cir. 2003); Johnson v. United States, 788 F.2d 845, 847 (2d Cir. 1986); Hughes v. United States, 662 F.2d 219, 220 (4th Cir. 1981); West v. United States, No. EDCV 15-01243, 2016 WL 1576382, at *l-2 (CD. Cal. Apr. 11, 2016); Hamburg v. U.S. Postal Se......
-
Holding the Federal Government Accountable for Sexual Assault
...(7th Cir. 2003); Johnson ex rel. Johnson v. United States, 788 F.2d 845, 847–55 (2d Cir. 1986); Hughes ex rel. Hughes v. United States, 662 F.2d 219, 219–20 (4th Cir. 1981); West v. United States, No. 15-01243-JLS, 2016 WL 1576382, at *1 (C.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2016); Hamburg v. U.S. Postal Ser......