Hulette v. United States

• Decision Date: 10 April 1963
• Docket Number: No. 14925.,14925.
• Citation: 315 F.2d 826
• Parties: James C. HULETTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.
• Court: U.S. Court of Appeals — Sixth Circuit

315 F.2d 826 (1963)

James C. HULETTE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 14925.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

April 10, 1963.

William A. Young, Frankfort, Ky., for appellant.

William A. Geoghegan, Asst. Deputy Atty. Gen., Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Lee A. Jackson, Robert N. Anderson, Charles B. E. Freeman, Attorneys, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C., William E. Scent, U. S. Atty., Louisville, Ky., on the brief, for appellee.

Before McALLISTER, WEICK and O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judges.

O'SULLIVAN, Circuit Judge.

In 1946, plaintiff-appellant, James C. Hulette, paid $300.00 for one share of stock of the Frankfort Country Club of Frankfort, Kentucky. He had to do this to become a voting member of the Club. In 1949, by paying an additional $300.00, he exchanged the above share of stock for one share of Class A common stock of the Club, issued as a part of the recapitalization of the Club. This made him a Class A member of the Club. In 1960, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue assessed a 20% excise tax against each of such $300.00 payments on the contention that they constituted "initiation fees." (§ 1710(a) (2) I.R.C.1939.) Plaintiff paid the total assessment of $120.00 and made claim for a refund. His claim was denied and he sued to recover the amount paid. His complaint was dismissed by the District Judge.

Hulette contended in the District Court, as he does here, that conceding that the $300.00 paid for his first share of stock in 1946 was a taxable "initiation fee," the assessment of an excise tax thereon in 1960 was barred by the four year limitation provided by § 3312 (a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939. As to the payment of $300.00 in 1949 to convert his original share into a Class A share, he asserts that such was not an "initiation fee," and that even if it was, assessment of an excise levy thereon in 1960 was barred by the aforesaid § 3312 (a) I.R.C.1939. The government contends that the 1949 payment to obtain the Class A stock was equivalent to payment of an "initiation fee" and that by virtue of § 3312(b) the limitation provided by § 3312(a) does not apply to the 1946 and 1949 payments because, it asserts, no returns disclosing such payments were ever made. (§ 3312(b) I.R.C.1939.)

1. Was the $300.00 paid in 1949 to convert Hulette's stock to a Class A share, the payment of an initiation fee?

The originally authorized capital stock of Frankfort County Club consisted of 300 shares with a par value of $300.00 per share. Purchase of one of such shares was necessary to become a member of the Club. Hulette concedes that his 1946 payment for the share acquired by him was a taxable "initiation fee." In 1949, the capital structure of the Club was changed by amending Art. V of the Articles to provide for two Classes of common stock and one of preferred stock.¹

In 1949, Hulette converted his originally owned one share of stock into a share of Class A Common Stock, thereby becoming a Class A Certificate member. He paid $300.00 in cash to effect the conversion of his stock. It is clear to us that this payment was a condition precedent to Hulette becoming a Class A Member of the Club, and, as such, became taxable as an "initiation fee." After the 1949 amendment to Article V, there existed two classes of membership in the Club, Class A and Class B. Ownership of one share of Class B Stock was essential to a Class B membership and one share of Class A stock to a Class A membership. After the reorganization, Class A members were required to pay only one-half of the annual dues exacted from Class B members. If the plaintiff-appellant's position is sustained, he will escape paying not only the excise levy on the amount paid to join the top membership in his club, which includes a 50% reduction in his dues, but will avoid paying the excise tax that Class B members will be paying on the excess of their dues over those payable by Class A members.

We have, in the case of McDonald v. United States of America, 315 F.2d 796, held that a bond purchased as a condition to the highest class of membership in a club is an initiation fee, notwithstanding that the bond purchaser could have acquired another type of membership without buying a bond. We think our McDonald decision is applicable and decisive of the question now before us.

While the following decisions contain some factual dissimilarities to those presented here, we believe they support the principle upon which we base our decision. Vitter v. United States, 279 F.2d 445 (C.A.5, 1960); United States v. Riverlake Country Club, 306 F.2d 564 (C.A.5, 1962); Billings v. Campbell (N. D.Tex., 1960), 188 F.Supp. 261; Edgewood Country Club v. United States (S.D. W.Va., 1962), 204 F.Supp. 508, affirmed 310 F.2d 379 (C.A.4, 1962).

We hold that the $300.00 paid by Hulette as a condition to acquiring a Class A membership in the Frankfort Club was a taxable initiation fee.

2. Were the assessments in question barred by the limitation provided in § 3312(a) I.R.C.1939?

As was the situation in McDonald v. United States of America, supra, the Frankfort Country Club made out and filed excise tax returns for the period in which Hulette paid for his first share of stock (1946) and for the period in which ...