Hull v. Burr
Decision Date | 16 November 1909 |
Citation | 50 So. 754,58 Fla. 475 |
Parties | HULL et al. v. BURR. |
Court | Florida Supreme Court |
On Rehearing, December 21, 1909.
In Banc. Appeal from Circuit Court, Polk County; J. B. Wall Judge.
Action by Arthur E. Burr, as trustee in bankruptcy of the Port Tampa Phosphate Company, against Joseph Hull and others. From an interlocutory decree overruling demurrers to the bill defendants appeal. Affirmed.
Syllabus by the Court
Section 2494 of the General Statutes of 1906, providing that 'all deeds of conveyance, obligations conditioned or defeasible bills of sale or other instruments of writing conveying or selling property, either real or personal, for the purpose or with the intention of securing the payment of money, whether such instrument be from the debtor to the creditor or from the debtor to some third person in trust for the creditor shall be deemed and held mortgages, and shall be subject to the same rules of foreclosure and to the same regulations, restraints, and forms as are prescribed in relation to mortgages,' is quite comprehensive in its scope, and should be liberally construed in order to carry out the legislative intent.
An instrument must be deemed and held a mortgage, whatever may be its form, if, taken alone or in connection with the surrounding facts and attendant circumstances, it appears to have been given for the purpose or with the intention of securing the payment of money; and the mere absence of terms of defeasance cannot determine whether it is a mortgage or not.
In construing any written instrument, whether a deed of conveyance, a bill of sale, mortgage, contract, or what not, the entire instrument must be considered in order to gather the real intent and to determine the true design of the makers thereof. To that end all the different provisions of such instrument must be looked to and all construed so as to give effect to each and every of them, if that can reasonably
Courts of equity in pursuance of a wise and benign rule in cases of doubt as to whether the parties intended the transaction to be an absolute deed of conveyance or bill of sale, conditional sale, or a mortgage will deem and hold the transaction and instrument to constitute a mortgage.
On Rehearing.
A petition for a rehearing in this court which suggests nothing in the case as presented that has not been fully considered by the court in making its decision will be denied; the proper function of a petition for a rehearing here being to present to the court some point which it overlooked or failed to consider, by reason whereof its judgment is supposed to be erroneous.
Any indefinite or uncertain allegations that may appear in a bill of complaint should be taken most strongly against the pleader.
Under the statutes of this state, a mortgagee acquires only a specific lien on the property of another described in the mortgage, and an 'instrument of writing conveying or selling property, either real or personal, for the purpose or with the intention of securing the payment of money,' may upon its face convey title to property, subject to the provisions of the statute that it 'shall be deemed and held a mortgage,' if by extrinsic facts the statute is shown to apply.
Bisbee & Bedell and Wilson & Swearingen, for appellants.
Glen & Himes and E. R. Gunby, for appellee.
On the 26th day of March, 1908, the appellee, as complainant, filed his original bill against the appellants as defendants. A demurrer was interposed to such bill, upon which the trial court made the following order:
On the 14th day of September, 1908, the complainant filed his amended bill, which, with the exhibit attached thereto, is as follows, omitting the purely formal parts:
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. City of Lakeland
... ... such argument, is violative of the rule and should be denied ... without further consideration. Jones v. Fox, 23 Fla ... 462, 2 So. 853; Hull v. Burr, 58 Fla. 475, 50 So ... 768; Malsby v. Gamble, 61 Fla. 327, 54 So. 766; ... Stewart v. Preston, 80 Fla. 479, 86 So. 348; ... Payne ... ...
- Tibbs v. State
-
Harbour Properties, Inc. v. Commissioner
...the transaction as a mortgage or conditional sale, hold it to be a mortgage. Franklin v. Ayer, 22 Fla. 654 (1886). Hull v. Burr, 58 Fla. 432, 50 So. 754 (1909); Thomas v. Thomas, 96 So. 2d 771 If an instrument is a mortgage when executed its character does not afterwards change, for once a ......
-
Crosby v. Andrews
...equity will be tested by the weaker rather than by the stronger allegations, or, as we held in the opinion on rehearing in Hull v. Burr, 58 Fla. 475, 50 So. 768, any indefinite or uncertain allegations that may appear in bill of complaint should be taken most strongly against the pleader. A......