Hulshizer v. Global Credit Services, Inc., 83-1789
| Decision Date | 24 February 1984 |
| Docket Number | No. 83-1789,83-1789 |
| Parties | 1984-1 Trade Cases 65,872 Eva M. HULSHIZER, Appellee, v. GLOBAL CREDIT SERVICES, INC., Appellant. |
| Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
Leroy P. Shuster, Lincoln, Neb., for appellee.
William B. Woodruff, P.C., Omaha, Neb., for appellant.
Before LAY, Chief Judge, and HEANEY and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges.
Global Credit Services, Inc., appeals from a district court judgment awarding Eva M. Hulshizer $200 in damages and $1,795.50 in attorney's fees and expenses for Global's violation of 15 U.S.C. Sec. 1692e(11) (1982). In the spring of 1982, Hulshizer received a letter from Global, dated April 14, 1982, seeking collection of a debt she owed to the University of Nebraska Hospital in the amount of $2,582.01. The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act requires debt collectors to "disclose clearly in all communications made to collect a debt or to obtain information about a consumer, that the debt collector is attempting to collect a debt and that any information obtained will be used for that purpose." Id. The parties agree that the required disclosures did not appear in the letter to Hulshizer.
Hulshizer brought a civil action against Global for this violation under 15 U.S.C. Sec. 1692k (1982), which allows suits to recover actual damages, additional damages up to $1,000, costs, and attorney's fees. Id. Sec. 1692k(a)(1), (2)(A), (3). The district court found a violation of the statute and awarded her "additional" damages, attorney's fees, and expenses. Global appeals, arguing that the court's literal reading of the statute failed to consider Global's reliance on a staff letter from an attorney in the Division of Credit Practices for the Federal Trade Commission (Commission), and that the violation was unintentional and thus protected under 15 U.S.C. Sec. 1692k(c) (1982).
Although the statute does allow debt collectors to rely in good faith on "any advisory opinion of the Commission" in communicating with debtors, id. Sec. 1692k(e), the letter which it cited to the district court indicating that the statute was not designed to require disclosures in straightforward communications with the debtor is not an opinion of the Commission. The letter clearly states that it See 16 C.F.R. Secs. 1.1-1.3 (1983). Furthermore, Global's...
To continue reading
Request your trial
-
Caputo v. Professional Recovery Services, Inc.
...in plain contravention of our opinion in Avila [v. Rubin, 84 F.3d 222 (7th Cir. 1996)]. See, e.g., Hulshizer v. Global Credit Servs., Inc., 728 F.2d 1037, 1038 (8th Cir.1984) (per curiam) (finding no basis to invoke the bona fide error defense where "[t]he language of the statute [was] unam......
-
Johnson v. Riddle
...451 (8th Cir.2001) (stating that bona fide error defense does not apply to mistakes of law) (citing Hulshizer v. Global Credit Servs., Inc., 728 F.2d 1037, 1038 (8th Cir.1984) (per curiam)); Pipiles v. Credit Bureau of Lockport, Inc., 886 F.2d 22, 27 (2d Cir.1989) (same); Baker v. G.C. Serv......
-
Jerman v. Carlisle
...e.g., 538 F.3d, at 476 (case below), with Baker v. G.C. Servs. Corp., 677 F.2d 775, 779 (C.A.9 1982), and Hulshizer v. Global Credit Servs., Inc., 728 F.2d 1037, 1038 (C.A.8 1984) (per curiam).The Courts of Appeals have also expressed different views about whether 15 U.S.C. § 1692k(c) appli......
-
Drossin v. National Action Financial Services
...582, 591 (D.Md.1999) (citing Pipiles v. Credit Bureau of Lockport, Inc., 886 F.2d 22, 27 (2d Cir.1989); Hulshizer v. Global Credit Services, Inc., 728 F.2d 1037, 1038 (8th Cir.1984); Baker v. G.C. Services Corp., 677 F.2d 775, 779 (9th Cir.1982)). If there is no showing of preventive proced......
-
Identifying Some Trouble Spots in the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act:a Framework for Improvement
...on advice of counsel or a mistake about the law is insufficient by itself to raise the bona fide error defense." Id. at 779. 358. 728 F.2d 1037 (8th Cir. 1984). 359. See id. at 1038. 360.A 1996 amendment to the FDCPA requires this disclosure only in the collector's initial communication, an......