HUMANE SOC. OF PIKES PEAK v. INDUS. OFFICE
| Decision Date | 26 April 2001 |
| Docket Number | No. 00CA0968.,00CA0968. |
| Citation | 26 P.3d 546 |
| Parties | HUMANE SOCIETY OF The PIKES PEAK REGION and Colorado Compensation Insurance Authority, Petitioners, v. The INDUSTRIAL CLAIM APPEALS OFFICE of the State of Colorado and Teresa L. Osinski, Respondents. |
| Court | Colorado Court of Appeals |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
17 cases
-
Lydy v. Trustaff, Inc.
...claimant by eliminating other fringe benefits. See Colo.Rev.Stat. § 8–40–201(19)(b); see also Humane Soc'y of Pikes Peak Region v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office, 26 P.3d 546, 549 (Colo.App.2001). ¶ 19. Unlike the Colorado Court of Appeals, this Court will not judicially legislate what would a......
-
People v. Payne
...("[W]e are not free to depart from the plain language of a supreme court rule."); see also Humane Soc’y of Pikes Peak Region v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office , 26 P.3d 546, 549 (Colo. App. 2001) ("[W]e may not read a nonexistent provision into the statute."). Because the trial court could not......
-
Cisneros v. Elder
..."due to negligence" in section 24-10-106(1.5)(b) gives no room for such an interpretation. See Humane Soc'y of Pikes Peak Region v. Indus. Claim App. Off. , 26 P.3d 546, 548 (Colo. App. 2001) ("[I]f our interpretation of the clear language used in the statute does not correspond to the Gene......
-
Mosley v. Industrial Claim Appeals Office
...to, and resolved by, the General Assembly. See Kraus v. Artcraft Sign Co., 710 P.2d 480 (Colo.1985); Humane Soc'y v. Indus. Claim Appeals Office, 26 P.3d 546 (Colo.App.2001); see also Bills v. Ariz. Prop. & Cas. Ins. Guar. Fund, supra, 984 P.2d at 583 (stating that claimant's policy argumen......
Request a trial to view additional results