Humes v. United States, No. 150

CourtUnited States Supreme Court
Writing for the CourtMcKENNA
Citation18 S.Ct. 602,42 L.Ed. 1011,170 U.S. 210
PartiesHUMES v. UNITED STATES
Docket NumberNo. 150
Decision Date25 April 1898
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
54 practice notes
  • Buessel v. United States, 178.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • April 16, 1919
    ...as well as in the state courts. Myers v. Pittsburgh Coal Co., 233 U.S. 184, 195, 34 Sup.Ct. 559, 58 L.Ed. 906; Humes v. United States, 170 U.S. 210, 212, 18 Sup.Ct. 602, 42 L.Ed. 1011; St. Clair v. United States, 154 U.S. 134, 153, 14 Sup.Ct. 1002, 38 L.Ed. 936; Tucker v. United States, 151......
  • Stassi v. United States, No. 9086.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
    • June 8, 1931
    ...of error are without merit. Texas & Pacific Railway v. Volk, 151 U. S. 73, 78, 14 S. Ct. 239 38 L. Ed. 78." In Humes v. United States, 170 U. S. 210, 211, 18 S. Ct. 602, 42 L. Ed. 1011, the court stated that a part of the assignments of error related to the failure of the court to give cert......
  • Kelly v. United States, 2978.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit)
    • January 7, 1919
    ...361, 362, 11 Sup.Ct. 355, 34 L.Ed. 958; France v. United States, 164 U.S. 676, 681, 17 Sup.Ct. 219, 41 L.Ed. 595; Humes v. United States, 170 U.S. 210, 212, 213, 18 Sup.Ct. 602, 42 L.Ed. 1011; Burton v. United States, supra, 202 U.S. 373, 26 Sup.Ct. 688, 50 L.Ed. 1057, 6 Ann.Cas. 362; Ling ......
  • Kinard v. United States, No. 6969.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • March 7, 1938
    ...need not consider the other assignments of error. Reversed and remanded for new trial. --------Notes: 1 See, also, Humes v. United States, 170 U.S. 210, 18 S.Ct. 602, 42 L.Ed. 1011; Isaacs v. United States, 159 U.S. 487, 16 S.Ct. 51, 40 L.Ed. 229; Goldsby v. United States, 160 U.S. 70, 16 S......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
54 cases
  • Buessel v. United States, 178.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (2nd Circuit)
    • April 16, 1919
    ...as well as in the state courts. Myers v. Pittsburgh Coal Co., 233 U.S. 184, 195, 34 Sup.Ct. 559, 58 L.Ed. 906; Humes v. United States, 170 U.S. 210, 212, 18 Sup.Ct. 602, 42 L.Ed. 1011; St. Clair v. United States, 154 U.S. 134, 153, 14 Sup.Ct. 1002, 38 L.Ed. 936; Tucker v. United States, 151......
  • Stassi v. United States, No. 9086.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (8th Circuit)
    • June 8, 1931
    ...of error are without merit. Texas & Pacific Railway v. Volk, 151 U. S. 73, 78, 14 S. Ct. 239 38 L. Ed. 78." In Humes v. United States, 170 U. S. 210, 211, 18 S. Ct. 602, 42 L. Ed. 1011, the court stated that a part of the assignments of error related to the failure of the court to give cert......
  • Kelly v. United States, 2978.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (6th Circuit)
    • January 7, 1919
    ...361, 362, 11 Sup.Ct. 355, 34 L.Ed. 958; France v. United States, 164 U.S. 676, 681, 17 Sup.Ct. 219, 41 L.Ed. 595; Humes v. United States, 170 U.S. 210, 212, 213, 18 Sup.Ct. 602, 42 L.Ed. 1011; Burton v. United States, supra, 202 U.S. 373, 26 Sup.Ct. 688, 50 L.Ed. 1057, 6 Ann.Cas. 362; Ling ......
  • Kinard v. United States, No. 6969.
    • United States
    • United States Courts of Appeals. United States Court of Appeals (District of Columbia)
    • March 7, 1938
    ...need not consider the other assignments of error. Reversed and remanded for new trial. --------Notes: 1 See, also, Humes v. United States, 170 U.S. 210, 18 S.Ct. 602, 42 L.Ed. 1011; Isaacs v. United States, 159 U.S. 487, 16 S.Ct. 51, 40 L.Ed. 229; Goldsby v. United States, 160 U.S. 70, 16 S......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT