Hunt v. Board of Education of County of Kanawha, Civ. A. No. 70-225.
Court | United States District Courts. 4th Circuit. Southern District of West Virginia |
Writing for the Court | John O. Kizer, Campbell, Love, Woodroe & Kizer, Charleston, W. Va., for defendants |
Citation | 321 F. Supp. 1263 |
Parties | Dale HUNT and Gale Hunt, by next friend, their parent, Mrs. Levi Hunt, Barbara Williams, by next friend, her parent, Mrs. Harvey Williams, Donna Stewart, by next friend, her parent, Mr. Carl Stewart, Jackie Blake, by next friend, her parent, Mrs. L. A. Blake, Eddie Long, by next friend, his parent, Mr. William Long, Plaintiffs, v. The BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the COUNTY OF KANAWHA, Albert Anson, Jr., President, in his official capacity, the Department of Education of the State of West Virginia, Daniel B. Taylor, Superintendent, in his official capacity, Defendants. |
Decision Date | 18 January 1971 |
Docket Number | Civ. A. No. 70-225. |
321 F. Supp. 1263
Dale HUNT and Gale Hunt, by next friend, their parent, Mrs. Levi Hunt, Barbara Williams, by next friend, her parent, Mrs. Harvey Williams, Donna Stewart, by next friend, her parent, Mr. Carl Stewart, Jackie Blake, by next friend, her parent, Mrs. L. A. Blake, Eddie Long, by next friend, his parent, Mr. William Long, Plaintiffs,
v.
The BOARD OF EDUCATION OF the COUNTY OF KANAWHA, Albert Anson, Jr., President, in his official capacity, the Department of Education of the State of West Virginia, Daniel B. Taylor, Superintendent, in his official capacity, Defendants.
Civ. A. No. 70-225.
United States District Court, S. D. West Virginia, Charleston Division.
January 18, 1971.
John L. Boettner, Jr., Charleston, W. Va. (Appalachian Research and Defense Fund, Inc.), for plaintiffs.
John O. Kizer, Campbell, Love, Woodroe & Kizer, Charleston, W. Va., for defendants.
MEMORANDUM ORDER
JOHN A. FIELD, Jr., Chief Judge.
This action was instituted by six students of Herbert Hoover High School in Kanawha County seeking to enjoin and restrain the defendants from prohibiting the plaintiffs to meet voluntarily on the premises of the school for the purpose of engaging in group prayer and for a declaratory judgment that these acts of the defendants violate the rights of the plaintiffs under the first and 14th amendments to the Constitution of the United States. The plaintiffs also moved for a preliminary injunction to enjoin the defendants from interference with the said activities of the plaintiffs, and a hearing was held and evidence taken relative to this motion on November 16, 1970. On December 1, 1970, an order was entered denying the motion of the plaintiffs for the preliminary injunction. The defendant, Daniel B. Taylor, Superintendent of the Department of Education of the State of West Virginia, has filed a motion for summary judgment and his affidavit in support thereof. The other defendants, the Board of Education of the County of Kanawha, and Albert Anson, Jr., President of the Board, filed an answer to
The undisputed facts are as follows. The plaintiffs are citizens of the United States and residents of the town of Elkview, Kanawha County, West Virginia, and are regularly enrolled as students at Herbert Hoover High School in said County. The Board of Education of the County of Kanawha is a corporation under the laws of the State of West Virginia and is charged with the administration of the public schools of Kanawha County, and Albert Anson, Jr., is a member of the Board of Education and is president of the Board. During or prior to the year 1956, the Board of Education prepared and adopted a Manual of Administration, copies of which Manual were delivered to all supervisory and administrative personnel of the school system for their guidance in following the approved policies and procedures for the administration of the public schools in Kanawha County.
Included in the Manual are the following sections which were duly approved and adopted by the Board and have been at all times pertinent to this litigation in full force and effect.
Section 11.212—"Requests for the use of school buildings for religious purposes shall not be granted. However, baccalaureate services may be held provided the major purpose of such baccalaureate service is teaching and stressing moral and ethical values and is not religious."
Section 2.117—"School Conduct and Discipline
"* * * No student shall be in a school building without the supervision of a teacher."
Section 2.1117—"Pupils at School Before and After Hours
"When the weather and the condition of the school grounds are favorable, it is usually better from a...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Johnson v. Huntington Beach Union High Sch. Dist.
...would have no claim to use public property for Bible study purposes. (Cf. Hunt v. Board of Education of County of Kanawha, D.C., 321 F.Supp. 1263, in which student prayer not connected with an ongoing student club program or any other school-established forum was held by a federal judge not......
-
Brandon v. Board of Ed. of Guilderland Central School Dist., No. 291
...wish to conduct voluntary prayer meetings during the school day does not violate the Free Exercise Clause. Hunt v. Board of Education, 321 F.Supp. 1263 (S.D.W.Va.1971); Trietley v. Board of Education, supra; Johnson v. Huntington Beach Union High School District, 68 Cal.App.3d 1, 137 Cal.Rp......
-
Evans v. Hutchinson, No. 13487
...and hence operates to invoke the maxim of inclusio unius est exclusio alterius. Cf., Hunt v. Board of Education of County of Kanawha, 321 F.Supp. 1263 The obvious spirit of the statute permitting certain extra-educational uses of school facilities is to promote activities of a public rather......
-
Lowrie v. Goldenhersh, No. 80C436.
..."this is not to say that the state cannot require a reasonable period of residency prior to taking the bar examination." Webster, 321 F.Supp. at 1263. Accord Lipman, 329 F.Supp. at 401-03. As Lipman additionally makes clear, each particular residency requirement is to be judged on the basis......
-
Johnson v. Huntington Beach Union High Sch. Dist.
...would have no claim to use public property for Bible study purposes. (Cf. Hunt v. Board of Education of County of Kanawha, D.C., 321 F.Supp. 1263, in which student prayer not connected with an ongoing student club program or any other school-established forum was held by a federal judge not......
-
Brandon v. Board of Ed. of Guilderland Central School Dist., No. 291
...wish to conduct voluntary prayer meetings during the school day does not violate the Free Exercise Clause. Hunt v. Board of Education, 321 F.Supp. 1263 (S.D.W.Va.1971); Trietley v. Board of Education, supra; Johnson v. Huntington Beach Union High School District, 68 Cal.App.3d 1, 137 Cal.Rp......
-
Evans v. Hutchinson, No. 13487
...and hence operates to invoke the maxim of inclusio unius est exclusio alterius. Cf., Hunt v. Board of Education of County of Kanawha, 321 F.Supp. 1263 The obvious spirit of the statute permitting certain extra-educational uses of school facilities is to promote activities of a public rather......
-
Lowrie v. Goldenhersh, No. 80C436.
...is not to say that the state cannot require a reasonable period of residency prior to taking the bar examination." Webster, 321 F.Supp. at 1263. Accord Lipman, 329 F.Supp. at 401-03. As Lipman additionally makes clear, each particular residency requirement is to be judged on the basis ......