HUNT V. STATE
| Docket Number | No. CR-14-484 |
| Decision Date | 04 February 2015 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
7 cases
-
Hunt v. State
...Ray Hunt II's convictions for three counts of rape and his sentence to an aggregate term of 480 months' imprisonment. Hunt v. State , 2015 Ark. App. 53, 454 S.W.3d 771. Hunt filed a petition in this court in which he requests this court's permission to proceed in the trial court with a peti......
-
Hughes v. State
...evidence of guilt. Kidd v. State , 24 Ark. App. 55, 62, 748 S.W.2d 38, 41 (1988) ; see also , e.g. , Hunt v. State , 2015 Ark. App. 53, at 5, 454 S.W.3d 771, 775. We note that a terroristic threat need not be explicit or verbal, and there is no requirement that its intended recipient actual......
-
Smith v. State
...purpose, including proof of intent, motive, or knowledge. The rule applies to evidence of prior and subsequent bad acts. Hunt v. State, 2015 Ark. App. 53, 454 S.W.3d 771. Moreover, the rule’s list of permissible purposes for other-acts evidence is 10not exhaustive. It has long been the law,......
-
Washington v. State
...further supports each of Washington’s convictions since flight is evidence of consciousness of guilt. See, e.g., Hunt v. State, 2015 Ark. App. 53, at 5-6, 454 S.W.3d 771, 774-75. The evidence likewise substantiated that Washington twice committed sexual indecency with a child. Washington wa......
Get Started for Free
