Hunter v. Federal Life Ins. Co.

Decision Date19 April 1939
Docket NumberNo. 11349.,11349.
Citation103 F.2d 192
PartiesHUNTER v. FEDERAL LIFE INS. CO. et al.
CourtU.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit

Herschel Bricker, of Little Rock, Ark., for appellant.

J. H. Carmichael, of Little Rock, Ark., for appellee Federal Life Ins. Co.

Henry E. Spitzberg, of Little Rock, Ark., guardian ad litem for Betty Jane Hunter, Mary Ann Hunter, and LaFayette McClintock Hunter, Jr.

Before SANBORN, THOMAS, and VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judges.

SANBORN, Circuit Judge.

The Federal Life Insurance Company, of Chicago, Illinois, filed this suit in inter-pleader in the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Arkansas, alleging that LaFayette McClintock Hunter, one of its insured under a $5,000 life policy, had died on September 3, 1935, and that his wife, Hazel Marie Hunter, as the named beneficiary, claimed the proceeds of the policy, and that, upon the other hand, Henry E. Osterloh, Trustee, and the three minor children of the insured, claimed to be entitled to the proceeds. The alleged claimants, all citizens of Arkansas, were named as defendants. They all appeared in the proceedings. Hazel Marie Hunter, while denying the right of the Company to bring the suit and the jurisdiction of the court to entertain it, asserted that she was entitled to the proceeds of the policy. Henry E. Osterloh, Trustee, disclaimed any interest. The other three defendants, minor children of the insured, appeared by their guardian ad litem and claimed that the insured had, prior to his death, effected a change of beneficiary by a letter, a copy of which is set out in the margin1, and that, at the time of his death, his wife was no longer the beneficiary under this policy.

The District Court, on June 23, 1938, entered an order that the Company, having deposited $5,000 in the registry of the Court, be discharged upon its interplea; that the defendants proceed to establish their rights in that Court; and that the attorneys for the Company be paid, for their services, the sum of $300 out of the sum deposited. After a trial, and on July 1, 1938, the Court entered a decree, which provided as follows:

"I. That the costs of this action be paid out of the funds deposited in the registry of the court.

"II. That the plaintiff, Federal Life Insurance Company be, and it is hereby, absolved from all liability to the defendants, and each of them to the extent of the sum of Five Thousand ($5,000.00) Dollars paid by it into the registry of this court.

"III. That the clerk of this court is hereby directed to forthwith determine the amount necessary to purchase from the plaintiff a single payment insurance contract to be payable in the face amount of Five Thousand ($5,000.00) Dollars on December 10, 1950. That the sum so determined to be necessary be awarded to the defendant, LaFayette McClintock Hunter, Jr., and that said sum be by the clerk of this court forthwith transmitted to the said Federal Life Insurance Company for said insurance contract, the beneficiary clause therein to read substantially as follows, to-wit:

"To LaFayette McClintock Hunter, Jr., if living, otherwise to Betty Jane Hunter and Mary Ann Hunter, if living, or if either be dead, then to the survivor; if all three be dead, then to Hazel Marie Hunter; and in the event of the death of LaFayette McClintock Hunter, Jr., Betty Jane Hunter, Mary Ann Hunter, and Hazel Marie Hunter, prior to December 10, 1950, then to the estate of LaFayette McClintock Hunter, father of LaFayette McClintock Hunter, Jr., beneficiary.

"IV. It is further ordered, adjudged and decreed that the sum of Three Hundred Dollars ($300.00) be awarded Henry S. Spitzberg as guardian ad litem for the minor defendants, same to be taxed as costs herein for his services in this court and upon appeal to the Circuit Court of Appeals, and the clerk of this court is directed to pay said sum upon request of the said Henry E. Spitzberg.

"V. That a fee of Five Dollars ($5.00) be awarded to Charles S. Harley, court reporter, to be taxed as costs herein, and the clerk of this court is directed to pay said sum upon the request of the said Charles S. Harley.

"VI. All of the rest and residue of said funds shall be retained in the registry of this court for such further orders as the court may deem proper upon submission of proper testimony, for which purpose the court doth retain jurisdiction and control of this cause for all other orders, judgments, and decrees as may be necessary to a just and proper distribution of the funds remaining in the registry of the court."

It will be noted that this decree directed that the clerk of the Court determine the amount necessary to purchase certain insurance for LaFayette McClintock Hunter, Jr., and transmit that amount to the Company for the purchase of such insurance. The clerk's determination of that question is not in the record. No disposition whatever was made of the balance of the proceeds, except the $300 was awarded to the guardian ad litem for services and $5 to the court reporter. It is obvious that the District Court...

To continue reading

Request your trial
13 cases
  • Republic of China v. American Express Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Second Circuit
    • June 12, 1951
    ...(2d ed. 1948) 3047. 11 Here he cites and quotes from Turman Oil Co. v. Lathrop, D.C., 8 F.Supp. 870, 873. 12 In Hunter v. Federal Life Ins. Co., 8 Cir., 103 F.2d 192, 194, the interpleader order had not become complete because there remained open the determination of the "amount necessary t......
  • Pan American Fire & Casualty Company v. Revere, Civ. A. No. 9952.
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — Eastern District of Louisiana
    • September 30, 1960
    ...28 U.S.C. § 1335(a) (1). See 3 Moore, Federal Practice, Para. 22.04(1), p. 3008, n. 4; Para. 22.08(2), p. 3025; Hunter v. Federal Life Ins. Co., 8 Cir., 103 F.2d 192 (Rule); A/S Krediit Pank v. Chase Manhattan Bank, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 155 F.Supp. 30, 34 (Rule, dictum as to Act, as amended in 194......
  • Brandt v. Renfield Importers, Ltd.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • July 15, 1959
    ...City Life Ins. Co., 8 Cir., 96 F.2d 108; Minnesota Min. & Mfg. Co. v. Technical Tape Corp., 7 Cir., 208 F.2d 159; Hunter v. Federal Life Ins. Co., 8 Cir., 103 F.2d 192; Brandt v. Renfield Importers, Ltd., 8 Cir., 216 F.2d As early as 1894, in Standley v. Roberts, supra 59 F. 839, the late J......
  • Hunter v. Federal Life Ins. Co.
    • United States
    • U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit
    • May 24, 1940
    ...appeal was dismissed for want of jurisdiction, since the District Court had only partially disposed of the issues. Hunter v. Federal Life Ins. Co., 8 Cir., 103 F.2d 192. Upon remand of the case, it was resubmitted and reargued. In July, 1939, findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a fina......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT