Hunter v. Federal Life Ins. Co.
Decision Date | 19 April 1939 |
Docket Number | No. 11349.,11349. |
Citation | 103 F.2d 192 |
Parties | HUNTER v. FEDERAL LIFE INS. CO. et al. |
Court | U.S. Court of Appeals — Eighth Circuit |
Herschel Bricker, of Little Rock, Ark., for appellant.
J. H. Carmichael, of Little Rock, Ark., for appellee Federal Life Ins. Co.
Henry E. Spitzberg, of Little Rock, Ark., guardian ad litem for Betty Jane Hunter, Mary Ann Hunter, and LaFayette McClintock Hunter, Jr.
Before SANBORN, THOMAS, and VAN VALKENBURGH, Circuit Judges.
The Federal Life Insurance Company, of Chicago, Illinois, filed this suit in inter-pleader in the District Court of the United States for the Eastern District of Arkansas, alleging that LaFayette McClintock Hunter, one of its insured under a $5,000 life policy, had died on September 3, 1935, and that his wife, Hazel Marie Hunter, as the named beneficiary, claimed the proceeds of the policy, and that, upon the other hand, Henry E. Osterloh, Trustee, and the three minor children of the insured, claimed to be entitled to the proceeds. The alleged claimants, all citizens of Arkansas, were named as defendants. They all appeared in the proceedings. Hazel Marie Hunter, while denying the right of the Company to bring the suit and the jurisdiction of the court to entertain it, asserted that she was entitled to the proceeds of the policy. Henry E. Osterloh, Trustee, disclaimed any interest. The other three defendants, minor children of the insured, appeared by their guardian ad litem and claimed that the insured had, prior to his death, effected a change of beneficiary by a letter, a copy of which is set out in the margin1, and that, at the time of his death, his wife was no longer the beneficiary under this policy.
The District Court, on June 23, 1938, entered an order that the Company, having deposited $5,000 in the registry of the Court, be discharged upon its interplea; that the defendants proceed to establish their rights in that Court; and that the attorneys for the Company be paid, for their services, the sum of $300 out of the sum deposited. After a trial, and on July 1, 1938, the Court entered a decree, which provided as follows:
It will be noted that this decree directed that the clerk of the Court determine the amount necessary to purchase certain insurance for LaFayette McClintock Hunter, Jr., and transmit that amount to the Company for the purchase of such insurance. The clerk's determination of that question is not in the record. No disposition whatever was made of the balance of the proceeds, except the $300 was awarded to the guardian ad litem for services and $5 to the court reporter. It is obvious that the District Court...
To continue reading
Request your trial-
Republic of China v. American Express Co.
...(2d ed. 1948) 3047. 11 Here he cites and quotes from Turman Oil Co. v. Lathrop, D.C., 8 F.Supp. 870, 873. 12 In Hunter v. Federal Life Ins. Co., 8 Cir., 103 F.2d 192, 194, the interpleader order had not become complete because there remained open the determination of the "amount necessary t......
-
Pan American Fire & Casualty Company v. Revere, Civ. A. No. 9952.
...28 U.S.C. § 1335(a) (1). See 3 Moore, Federal Practice, Para. 22.04(1), p. 3008, n. 4; Para. 22.08(2), p. 3025; Hunter v. Federal Life Ins. Co., 8 Cir., 103 F.2d 192 (Rule); A/S Krediit Pank v. Chase Manhattan Bank, D.C.S.D.N.Y., 155 F.Supp. 30, 34 (Rule, dictum as to Act, as amended in 194......
-
Brandt v. Renfield Importers, Ltd.
...City Life Ins. Co., 8 Cir., 96 F.2d 108; Minnesota Min. & Mfg. Co. v. Technical Tape Corp., 7 Cir., 208 F.2d 159; Hunter v. Federal Life Ins. Co., 8 Cir., 103 F.2d 192; Brandt v. Renfield Importers, Ltd., 8 Cir., 216 F.2d As early as 1894, in Standley v. Roberts, supra 59 F. 839, the late J......
-
Hunter v. Federal Life Ins. Co.
...appeal was dismissed for want of jurisdiction, since the District Court had only partially disposed of the issues. Hunter v. Federal Life Ins. Co., 8 Cir., 103 F.2d 192. Upon remand of the case, it was resubmitted and reargued. In July, 1939, findings of fact, conclusions of law, and a fina......