Huntington v. Chesapeake, O. & S.W. Ry. Co.

Decision Date01 July 1899
Citation98 F. 459
PartiesHUNTINGTON v. CHESAPEAKE, O & S.W. RY. CO. et al. (ZACHER, Intervener).
CourtUnited States Circuit Court, District of Kentucky

Simrall & Doolan, for plaintiff in garnishment Cranch.

Humphrey & Davie, for intervener Zacher.

Harris & Barr and Wallace & McDonald, for garnishee Fidelity Trust &amp Safety-Vault Co.

EVANS District Judge.

The Newport News & Mississippi Valley Company was a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Connecticut, and authorized to lease and operate railroads in any state except Connecticut. In 1886 it leased a railroad in Kentucky belonging to the Chesapeake, Ohio & Southwestern Railway Company, and operated it until July 31, 1893, when the lease by mutual consent of the parties, was canceled. Meanwhile the first-named company became insolvent, owing at the time something over $1,000,000 to C. P. Huntington. Shortly after this particular indebtedness was satisfactorily arranged namely at a meeting of the stockholders held March 16, 1894 it was unanimously resolved by the quorum of stockholders present that the affairs of the company be wound up. On March 20, 1894, in a suit brought against the company by C. P. Huntington in the superior court of Connecticut, and after the service upon defendant of a copy of the complaint therein, Edmund Zacher was appointed a temporary receiver for the company. Huntington was then a stockholder, but not a creditor, of the Newport News & Mississippi Valley Company, against which his suit was filed. On April 13, 1894, the said Zacher was made the permanent receiver, and by the judgment of the court then entered was given full power and authority to take charge of the affairs, property, and business of the defendant corporation, wherever situate, and to manage the same. This was all done under the provisions of section 1942 of the General Statutes of Connecticut, which reads as follows:

'The superior court in the county in which any corporation, organized under the laws of this state, has its principal place of business, may, as a court of equity, on the application of any of its stockholders, wind up its affairs and dissolve it, if said court shall find that said corporation has voted to wind up its affairs, or abandoned the business for which it was organized, and has thereafter neglected within a reasonable time or in a proper manner to wind up its affairs and distribute its effects among its stockholders; and for this purpose may, if it deem it necessary, appoint one or more receivers of the estate of said corporation, and limit a time for its creditors to present their claims to such receivers, and direct public notice thereof to be given; and all claims not presented within such time shall be barred. Said receivers shall allow all just claims against said corporation, collects its debts, sell its property, and convert the same into money, and report their doings to said court as it may direct. Said court may, on complaint of any person aggrieved by such doings, grant such relief as the nature of the case may require; and it may make such orders as to the doings of the receivers, their compensation, and other expenses, and as to the payment of debts and distribution of the effects of said corporation, as may be just and conformable to law.' Under date of April 14, 1894, but upon acknowledgment taken on May 9, 1894, the company, by its president, F. H. Davis, executed a writing to said Zacher, receiver, which, with its certificate of acknowledgment, is in the following words:

'Know all men by these presents, that the Newport News & Mississippi Valley Company, a corporation created, organized, and existing under the laws of the state of Connecticut, for and in consideration of one dollar to it in hand paid, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, conveyed, assigned, transferred, and set over, and hereby grants, conveys, assigns, transfers, and sets over, to Edmund Zacher, of the city of New Haven, in the state of Connecticut, as he has been appointed by the superior court of the state of Connecticut, in and for the county of New Haven, receiver of the property of the said Newport News & Mississippi Valley Company, all the property and assets, real, personal, and mixed, of said Newport News & Mississippi Valley Company, and all the claims, demands, and choses in action of or belonging to the said Newport News & Mississippi Valley Company, of whatever character the same may be, or in whatever state or country the same may be situated, to have and to hold to the said Zacher, as he has been appointed receiver, as aforesaid, and his successors and assigns, forever.
'In witness whereof the said Newport News & Mississippi Valley Company has caused these presents to be signed by its president, and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed and attested by its secretary, this 14th day of April, 1894.
'Newport News & Mississippi Valley Co.,
'(seal.) By F.H. Davis, President.
'Attest: Chas. Babbidge, Secretary.'
'State of New York, City and County of New York-- ss.' I, George H. Corey, a commissioner for the state of Kentucky, duly commissioned and qualified, and residing in the city and county of New York, hereby certify that this instrument of writing from the Newport News & Mississippi Valley Company to Edmund Zacher was this day produced to me by the parties, and which was acknowledged to me by Frank H. Davis, president, and Charles Babbidge, secretary, to be the act and deed of said the Newport News & Mississippi Valley Company. Given under my hand and official seal this ninth day of May, A.D. 1894.
'(Seal.) Geo. H. Corey, Commissioner for the State of Kentucky.
'Office: 66 Wall Street, N.Y."

There appears to have been no authority given by the company to its president to execute such a paper until May 8, 1894, when it was done at a meeting of the stockholders by a resolution in the following language:

'New York, May 8th, 1894.
'A meeting of the board of directors of the Newport News & Mississippi Valley Company, duly called, was held at the office of the company, No. 23 Board street, at three o'clock p.m. Present: I. E. Gates, F. H. Davis, A. K. Van Deeventer, C. Weidenfeld, and Charles Babbidge. On motion of Mr. Gates, seconded by Mr. Weidenfeld, it was resolved that the conveyance and transfer of all the property and assets, real, personal, and mixed, of this company, and all the claims, demands, and choses in action of or belonging to this company, of whatever character the same may be, or in whatever state or country the same may be situated, heretofore executed to Edmund Zacher, as he has been appointed by the superior court of the state of Connecticut, in and for the county of New Haven, receiver of the property of this company, and the execution on
...

To continue reading

Request your trial
2 cases
  • Deschenes v. Tallman
    • United States
    • New York Court of Appeals Court of Appeals
    • May 1, 1928
    ...here if we were required to determine whether the title would prevail against the remedies of creditors. Cf. Huntington v. Chesapeake, O. & S. W. Ry. Co. (C. C. A.) 98 F. 459, 464;Osborn v. Adams, 18 Pick. (Mass.) 245. A title acquired in foreign insolvency proceedings is subordinated to lo......
  • Louisville Trust Co. v. Marx
    • United States
    • U.S. District Court — District of Kentucky
    • December 23, 1899

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT