Hupp v. Beck Energy Corp., 2014-1933
| Decision Date | 28 January 2015 |
| Docket Number | NO. 2014-1933,2014-1933 |
| Citation | 23 N.E.3d 1196 (Table),141 Ohio St.3d 1454,2015 Ohio 239 |
| Parties | Hupp v. Beck Energy Corp. |
| Court | Ohio Supreme Court |
141 Ohio St.3d 1454
23 N.E.3d 1196 (Table)
2015 Ohio 239
Hupp
v.
Beck Energy Corp.
NO. 2014-1933
Supreme Court of Ohio
January 28, 2015
APPEAL ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW
Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law Nos. I and II; sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2014-0423, State ex rel. Claugus Family Farm, L.P. v. Seventh Dist. Court of Appeals.
PFEIFER and O'NEILL, JJ., would also accept Proposition of Law No. III.
To continue reading
Request your trial
4 cases
-
Dennison Bridge, Inc. v. Res. Energy, L. L.C.
...repair the well and to place it back into production. The trial court overruled Appellant's perpetual lease argument by citing the decision in Hupp, which this court released on September 26, 2014. See Hupp v. Beck Energy Corp., 7th Dist., 2014-Ohio-4255, 20 N.E.3d 732.{¶ 15} Appellant file......
-
State ex rel. Claugus Family Farm, L.P. v. Seventh Dist. Court of Appeals
...unnamed class members. On January 28, 2015, we granted jurisdiction on only the following two propositions of law, see Hupp v. Beck Energy Corp., 141 Ohio St.3d 1454, 2015-Ohio-239, 23 N.E.3d 1196 :[I.] An oil and gas lease which can be maintained indefinitely without development is a perpe......
-
Baxter v. Reserve Energy Exploration Co., CASE NO. 2014-T-0113
...the leases were for a term, not perpetual. Hupp, supra, at ¶85-104. The landowners appealed; and, January 28, 2015, in Hupp v. Beck Energy Corp., 141 Ohio St.3d 1454, 2015-Ohio-239, the Supreme Court accepted the appeal on the following propositions of law: {¶44} "An oil and gas lease which......
-
Ware v. Chesapeake Exploration, L.L.C.
...at 5). The Wares point out, however, the Ohio Supreme Court has accepted a discretionary appeal of that decision. See Heck v. Beck Energy Corp., 141 Ohio St. 3d 1454 (2015). Thus, the Wares submit that this Court should defer ruling on this issue until the matter has beenresolved by the Ohi......