Hurlbert v. Gordon
| Court | Washington Supreme Court |
| Citation | Hurlbert v. Gordon, 833 P.2d 1389, 119 Wn.2d 1015 (Wash. 1992) |
| Decision Date | 30 June 1992 |
| Parties | Hurlbert (Raymond R.), Hammer (Stephen R., Wesley James) v. Gordon (Joseph H., Jane Doe), Thomas (Charles L., Jane Doe), Malanca (Albert H., Jane Doe), O'Hern (James E., Jane Doe), Murray (E.M. , Jane Doe), Gordon, Thomas, Honeywell, Malanca, Peterson and O'Hern NO. 59210-1 |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeStart Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial of vLex and Vincent AI, Your Precision-Engineered Legal Assistant
-
Access comprehensive legal content with no limitations across vLex's unparalleled global legal database
-
Build stronger arguments with verified citations and CERT citator that tracks case history and precedential strength
-
Transform your legal research from hours to minutes with Vincent AI's intelligent search and analysis capabilities
-
Elevate your practice by focusing your expertise where it matters most while Vincent handles the heavy lifting
Start Your Free Trial
5 cases
-
Stiley v. Block
... ... 61 Respondent ... Page 501 ... Block relied on Hurlbert v. Gordon 62 to support this argument at trial and in his brief to the Court of Appeals ... Hurlbert involved the sale of real ... ...
-
Litho Color, Inc. v. Pacific Employers Ins.
... ... See, e.g., Hurlbert v. Gordon, 64 Wash.App. 386, 824 P.2d 1238, review denied, 119 Wash.2d 1015, 833 P.2d 1389 (1992). The purpose of these rules is to enable the ... ...
-
State v. Olson
... ... See, e.g., Hurlbert v. Gordon, 64 Wash.App. 386, 824 P.2d 1238, rev. denied, 119 Wash.2d 1015, 833 P.2d 1389 (1992) ... --------------- ... * Judge Robert F. Utter is ... ...
-
State v. Parada
... ... Hurlbert v. Gordon, 64 Wash.App. 386, 396, 824 P.2d 1238, review denied, 119 Wash.2d 1015, 833 P.2d 1389 (1992). Further, ... [a]n agent has ... ...
Get Started for Free
5 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...Huffman v. Ellen Mining Co., 118 Wash. 546, 204 P. 197 (1922): 6.10(3) Hurlbert v. Gordon, 64 Wn. App. 386, 824 P.2d 1238, review denied, 119 Wn.2d 1015 (1992): 17.2(1), 18.4(5) I_____________________________________________________________________ Isla Verde Int'l Holdings, Inc. v. City of......
-
Table of Cases
...App. 38, 848 P.2d 185, review denied, 122 Wn.2d 1020 (1993): 11.4(7) Hurlbert v. Gordon, 64 Wn. App. 386, 824 P.2d 1238, review denied, 119 Wn.2d 1015 (1992): 14.6(4), 14.8(10)(a), 14.8(12)(h) Hwang v. McMahill, 103 Wn. App. 945, 15 P.3d 172 (2000), review denied, 144 Wn.2d 1011 (2001): 17.......
-
§ 14.8 Brief of Appellant or Petitioner
...See Washburn v. Beatt Equip. Co., 120 Wn.2d 246, 840 P.2d 860 (1992); Hurlbert v. Gordon, 64 Wn.App. 386, 824 P.2d 1238, review denied, 119 Wn.2d 1015 The court clerk may reject a brief for filing if a party fails to cite the record. All three divisions of the Court of Appeals review briefs......
-
§ 17.2 - Attorney/Client Relations: Duty to Nonclients; Fees and Trust Funds
...serves both as counsel to a party and as escrow or closing agent. See Hurlbert v. Gordon, 64 Wn.App. 386, 824 P.2d 1238, review denied, 119 Wn.2d 1015 (1992) (acting as closing agent does not cause the attorney to represent all parties). When the subject of the lawyer's representation may b......
Get Started for Free
