Hurst v. Caledonia Haulers, Inc.

• Decision Date: 17 February 2022
• Docket Number: A21-1390
• Citation: 970 N.W.2d 70 (Mem)
• Parties: Joan E. HURST, Respondent, v. CALEDONIA HAULERS, INC. and Cottingham & Butler Claim Services, Inc., Relators.
• Court: Minnesota Supreme Court

970 N.W.2d 70 (Mem)

Joan E. HURST, Respondent,

v.CALEDONIA HAULERS, INC. and Cottingham & Butler Claim Services, Inc., Relators.

A21-1390

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

February 17, 2022

Kerry Atkinson, Atkinson Gerber Law Office, P.A., Saint Paul, Minnesota, for respondent.

James Connor, Jacob Colling, Aafedt, Forde, Gray, Monson & Hager, P.A., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for relators.

Considered and decided by the court without oral argument.

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed September 27, 2021, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton , 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn. 1982) (explaining that summary affirmances lack precedential value "because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view," and because they "do no more than establish the law of the case").

BY THE COURT:

/s/

Associate Justice