Hurst v. Carolina, No. 05-11748.

CourtUnited States Supreme Court
Citation549 U.S. 875,166 L.Ed.2d 131,75 USLW 3169,127 S.Ct. 186
Docket NumberNo. 05-11748.
PartiesJason Wayne HURST, petitioner, v. NORTH CAROLINA.
Decision Date02 October 2006

549 U.S. 875
127 S.Ct.
186
166 L.Ed.2d 131
75 USLW 3169

Jason Wayne HURST, petitioner,
v.
NORTH CAROLINA.

No. 05-11748.

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 2, 2006.


Case below, 360 N.C. 181, 624 S.E.2d 309.

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of North Carolina denied.

To continue reading

Request your trial
19 practice notes
  • State Carolina v. Phillips, No. 48A08.
    • United States
    • North Carolina United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
    • June 16, 2011
    ...L.Ed.2d 60 (1995), and overruled in part on other grounds by State v. Hurst, 360 N.C. 181, 198–99, 624 S.E.2d 309, 322–23, cert. denied, 549 U.S. 875, 127 S.Ct. 186, 166 L.Ed.2d 131 (2006). The arguments in question, cautioning jurors against reaching a decision on the basis of their “feeli......
  • State v. Taylor, No. 719A05.
    • United States
    • North Carolina United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
    • December 12, 2008
    ...a defendant has no significant history of prior criminal activity." State v. Hurst, 360 N.C. 181, 197, 624 S.E.2d 309, 322, cert. denied, 549 U.S. 875, 127 S.Ct. 186, 166 L.Ed.2d 131 (2006). "The statutory mitigating circumstance of no significant history of prior criminal activity is not s......
  • State v. Rodriguez, No. 302A14
    • United States
    • North Carolina United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
    • June 8, 2018
    ...the 371 N.C. 320 existence of that mitigating circumstance, citing State v. Hurst , 360 N.C. 181, 197, 624 S.E.2d 309, 322, cert. denied , 549 U.S. 875, 127 S.Ct. 186, 166 L.Ed. 2d 131 (2006). According to defendant, the record contained ample evidence tending to show that that defendant's ......
  • State Carolina v. Eric Glenn Lane., No. 606A05.
    • United States
    • North Carolina United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
    • March 11, 2011
    ...N.C. 181, 197, 624 S.E.2d 309, 322 (alteration in original) (internal citation and internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 875, 127 S.Ct. 186, 166 L.Ed.2d 131 (2006). We noted as well that “substantial evidence” is “of such a nature that ‘ “a rational jury could conclude t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
19 cases
  • State Carolina v. Phillips, No. 48A08.
    • United States
    • North Carolina United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
    • June 16, 2011
    ...L.Ed.2d 60 (1995), and overruled in part on other grounds by State v. Hurst, 360 N.C. 181, 198–99, 624 S.E.2d 309, 322–23, cert. denied, 549 U.S. 875, 127 S.Ct. 186, 166 L.Ed.2d 131 (2006). The arguments in question, cautioning jurors against reaching a decision on the basis of their “feeli......
  • State v. Taylor, No. 719A05.
    • United States
    • North Carolina United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
    • December 12, 2008
    ...a defendant has no significant history of prior criminal activity." State v. Hurst, 360 N.C. 181, 197, 624 S.E.2d 309, 322, cert. denied, 549 U.S. 875, 127 S.Ct. 186, 166 L.Ed.2d 131 (2006). "The statutory mitigating circumstance of no significant history of prior criminal activity is not s......
  • State v. Rodriguez, No. 302A14
    • United States
    • North Carolina United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
    • June 8, 2018
    ...the 371 N.C. 320 existence of that mitigating circumstance, citing State v. Hurst , 360 N.C. 181, 197, 624 S.E.2d 309, 322, cert. denied , 549 U.S. 875, 127 S.Ct. 186, 166 L.Ed. 2d 131 (2006). According to defendant, the record contained ample evidence tending to show that that defendant's ......
  • State Carolina v. Eric Glenn Lane., No. 606A05.
    • United States
    • North Carolina United States State Supreme Court of North Carolina
    • March 11, 2011
    ...N.C. 181, 197, 624 S.E.2d 309, 322 (alteration in original) (internal citation and internal quotation marks omitted), cert. denied, 549 U.S. 875, 127 S.Ct. 186, 166 L.Ed.2d 131 (2006). We noted as well that “substantial evidence” is “of such a nature that ‘ “a rational jury could conclude t......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT