Hurst v. Florida, No. 14–7505.

CourtU.S. Supreme Court
Citation135 S.Ct. 1531 (Mem),191 L.Ed.2d 558
Docket NumberNo. 14–7505.
PartiesTimothy Lee HURST, petitioner, v. FLORIDA.
Decision Date09 March 2015

135 S.Ct. 1531 (Mem)
191 L.Ed.2d 558

Timothy Lee HURST, petitioner,
v.
FLORIDA.

No. 14–7505.

Supreme Court of the United States

March 9, 2015.


Opinion

Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperisgranted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of Florida granted limited to the following question: Whether Florida's death sentencing scheme violates the Sixth Amendment or the Eighth Amendment in light of this Court's decision in Ring v. Arizona,536 U.S. 584, 122 S.Ct. 2428, 153 L.Ed.2d 556 (2002).

To continue reading

Request your trial
11 practice notes
  • State v. Poole, No. SC18-245
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • 23 Enero 2020
    ...or the Eighth Amendment in light of this Court's decision in Ring v. Arizona." Hurst v. Florida, 575 U.S. 902, 902, 135 S.Ct. 1531, 191 L.Ed.2d 558 (2015). In his briefing to the Supreme Court, Hurst made a Sixth Amendment argument and an Eighth Amendment argument. His Sixth Amendment argum......
  • In re Davis, No. 89590-2
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Washington
    • 18 Mayo 2017
    ...scheme and the jury's role in making the Atkins ' intellectual disability determination), with Hurst v. Florida , ––– U.S. ––––, 135 S.Ct. 1531, 191 L.Ed.2d 558 (2015) (limiting review to the constitutionality of Florida's death penalty sentencing scheme).7 After briefing was complete, Davi......
  • Rauf v. State, No. 39, 2016
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Delaware
    • 2 Agosto 2016
    ...458. Id. at 621-22. 459. Id. at 620-21 (citations omitted). 460. Id. at 622 (internal quotation marks omitted). 461. Hurst v. Florida, 135 S.Ct. 1531, 1531 (2015). 462. Hildwin, 490 U.S. at 640-41. 463. Brief of Petitioner at 25, Hurst v. Florida, 136 S.Ct. 616 (Jan. 12, 2016) (No. 14-7505)......
  • Hurst v. State, No. SC12–1947.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • 14 Octubre 2016
    ...After Hurst sought certiorari review in the United States Supreme Court, that Court granted review in Hurst v. Florida, ––– U.S. ––––, 135 S.Ct. 1531, 191 L.Ed.2d 558 (2015), and agreed to entertain the following question:Whether Florida's death sentencing scheme violates the Sixth Amendmen......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
11 cases
  • State v. Poole, No. SC18-245
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • 23 Enero 2020
    ...or the Eighth Amendment in light of this Court's decision in Ring v. Arizona." Hurst v. Florida, 575 U.S. 902, 902, 135 S.Ct. 1531, 191 L.Ed.2d 558 (2015). In his briefing to the Supreme Court, Hurst made a Sixth Amendment argument and an Eighth Amendment argument. His Sixth Amendment argum......
  • In re Davis, No. 89590-2
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Washington
    • 18 Mayo 2017
    ...scheme and the jury's role in making the Atkins ' intellectual disability determination), with Hurst v. Florida , ––– U.S. ––––, 135 S.Ct. 1531, 191 L.Ed.2d 558 (2015) (limiting review to the constitutionality of Florida's death penalty sentencing scheme).7 After briefing was complete, Davi......
  • Rauf v. State, No. 39, 2016
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Delaware
    • 2 Agosto 2016
    ...458. Id. at 621-22. 459. Id. at 620-21 (citations omitted). 460. Id. at 622 (internal quotation marks omitted). 461. Hurst v. Florida, 135 S.Ct. 1531, 1531 (2015). 462. Hildwin, 490 U.S. at 640-41. 463. Brief of Petitioner at 25, Hurst v. Florida, 136 S.Ct. 616 (Jan. 12, 2016) (No. 14-7505)......
  • Hurst v. State, No. SC12–1947.
    • United States
    • United States State Supreme Court of Florida
    • 14 Octubre 2016
    ...After Hurst sought certiorari review in the United States Supreme Court, that Court granted review in Hurst v. Florida, ––– U.S. ––––, 135 S.Ct. 1531, 191 L.Ed.2d 558 (2015), and agreed to entertain the following question:Whether Florida's death sentencing scheme violates the Sixth Amendmen......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT